Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry; University of British, Columbia.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2021 Sep-Dec;34(3):101-104. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_256_18.
We analyze the University of British Columbia's Department of Political Science's first course on health, "Global Politics and Health," to determine whether one course could inform political science students to tackle health issues. The major concept was global public health is politics writ large, as determinants of health are rooted in economic and social power. Course objectives encouraged student agency in ameliorating population health status.
We use three surveys, with qualitative and quantitative components, to assess interest and knowledge of public health issues, and determine whether student agency increased as the course progressed.
We confirmed that political science develops an excellent foundation for the analysis of issues related to global public health status. One course can stimulate curiosity in health issues. Unexpectedly, we discovered that students' greatest learning outcome integrated personal, interpersonal, and scholarly analyses of health issues. This provided an avenue for students outside of the health sciences to frame mental health, sexuality, and other stigmatized subjects within scholarly discourse. After the course, virtually all students had developed a sense of agency, hope, and tools to understand the roots of mental and physical health. Following case studies on various countries, students quickly grasped the significant impact of politics and economics on people's health.
We recommend that political science departments offer courses that focus on health for all alongside existing courses on healthcare systems' politics. Furthermore, departments of public health may benefit from including political science courses as core elements of their curriculum to assist graduates in navigating the highly politicized infrastructure of public health. Both disciplines stand to gain from this interdisciplinary opportunity-- in the service of better health for all.
我们分析了不列颠哥伦比亚大学政治学系的第一门健康课程“全球政治与健康”,以确定一门课程是否可以让政治学专业的学生了解健康问题。主要概念是全球公共卫生是放大的政治,因为健康的决定因素根植于经济和社会权力之中。课程目标鼓励学生在改善人口健康状况方面发挥作用。
我们使用了三种具有定性和定量成分的调查,来评估学生对公共卫生问题的兴趣和知识,并确定随着课程的进展,学生的代理机构是否有所增加。
我们证实了政治学为分析与全球公共卫生状况相关的问题提供了极好的基础。一门课程可以激发学生对健康问题的好奇心。出乎意料的是,我们发现学生最大的学习成果是将个人、人际和学术分析整合在一起,以解决健康问题。这为非健康科学专业的学生提供了一个途径,使他们能够在学术话语中构建心理健康、性健康和其他污名化的话题。在课程结束后,几乎所有的学生都培养了一种能动性、希望和理解身心健康根源的工具。在对各国进行案例研究后,学生们很快就理解了政治和经济对人们健康的重大影响。
我们建议政治学系在现有的医疗保健系统政治课程之外,提供面向所有人的健康课程。此外,公共卫生部门可能受益于将政治学课程作为其课程的核心要素,以帮助毕业生在公共卫生高度政治化的基础设施中航行。这两个学科都可以从这种跨学科机会中受益——为所有人的更好健康服务。