[Application values of right atrial volume, myocardial strain and strain rate in evaluating right atrial function in patients with essential hypertension with normal left ventricular ejection fraction].

To explore the application values of right atrial (RA) volume, myocardial strain and strain rate in evaluating right atrial functions in patients with essential hypertension (EHT) with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We retrospectively collected a total of 126 EHT patients with normal LVEF, including 66 males and 60 females, age from 18 to 83(48±15) years from the Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital with Nanjing Medical University from March, 2018 to May, 2020. According to the left ventricular mass index, those patients were divided into without left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH) group (=66) and LVH group (=60), and 83 healthy volunteers were enrolled as control group, which including 42 males and 41 females, age from 14 to 88 (48±16) years. The total, passive and active RA emptying fraction (total RAEF, passive RAEF and active RAEF) were measured by using RA volumes method. The RA strain (S-reservoir, S-conduit, S-booster pump) and the strain rate (SR-reservoir, SR-conduit, SR-booster pump) were measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Total RAEF, S-reservoir, and Sr-reservoir represented the reservoir function, while passive RAEF, S-conduit, and Sr-conduit represented the conduit function, and active RAEF, S-booster pump and Sr-booster pump represented the booster pump function, respectively. Than the values between the EHT patients and normal subjects, and the values among the EHT patients without LVH, EHT patients without LVH and normal subjects were compared. The value of active RAEF was significantly lower in EHT patient than normal controls (40.1%±10.5% vs 45.4%±11.1%,=0.001). There were significant differences among EHT patients without LVH, EHT patients with LVH and normal subjects in passive RAEF and active RAEF (passive RAEF: 40.2%±9.3% vs 36.4%±10.7% vs 36.5%±9.4%, =0.038, active RAEF: 39.8%±10.6% vs 40.4%±10.4% vs 45.4%±11.1%, =0.002). There were significant differences in S-reservoir, S-conduit, S-booster pump, SR-reservoir, SR-conduit and SR-booster pump between EHT patients and normal subjects [S-reservoir: 34.8%±13.7% vs 45.0%±13.3%, S-conduit: 18.3%±9.4% vs 26.5%±9.6%, S-booster pump: 16.4%±7.3% vs 18.6%±7.1%, SR-reservoir: (1.6±0.6)/s vs (2.0±0.6)/s, SR-conduit: (-1.2±0.5)/s vs (-1.6±0.6)/s, SR-booster pump: (-1.7±0.6)/s vs (-2.3±0.6)/s; all <0.05]. The trend tests showed normal controls achieved the largest the absolute values of S-reservoir, S-conduit, SR-reservoir, SR-conduit, SR-booster pump, followed by EHT patients without LVH and EHT patients with LVH(all <0.001). Using RA volume, myocardial strain and strain rate can detect the RA impaired reservoir, conduit, and the booster pump functions in EHT patients with normal LVEF, and the RA functions were damaged more significantly in EHT patients with LVH.