Marigi Erick M, Till Sara E, Wasserburger Jory N, Reinholz Anna K, Krych Aaron J, Stuart Michael J
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022 Aug;15(4):244-251. doi: 10.1007/s12178-022-09764-5. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary on the current literature and trends regarding use of the inside-out approach to meniscus repair. Additionally, the paper describes the authors preferred techniques for inside-out meniscus repair utilizing posteromedial and posterolateral exposures.
There has been a substantial increase in recent publications regarding meniscus repair. However, comparisons regarding the optimal repair technique have not been conclusive. Despite the recent increase in use of all-inside devices, multiple investigations with short-to-mid-term follow-up have demonstrated similar rates of meniscus healing between inside-out and all-inside repair techniques. Similarly, current literature describes comparable failure rates of around 20%. There are variations in the profile of complications, with all-inside devices having more implant-related complications and inside-out techniques with higher neurovascular injuries. Inside-out meniscus repair is a versatile, cost-effective technique that remains the gold standard for management of most meniscus tear patterns. Through a thoughtful approach, efficient suture retrieval and repair can be performed while protecting critical neurovascular structures. All-inside meniscus repair devices have increased in popularity and surgeon access, but this technique is not without limitations and comparisons to inside-out meniscus repair demonstrates equivocal outcomes.
本综述旨在提供关于使用由内向外法修复半月板的当前文献和趋势的最新总结。此外,本文还描述了作者使用后内侧和后外侧入路进行由内向外半月板修复的首选技术。
最近关于半月板修复的出版物大幅增加。然而,关于最佳修复技术的比较尚无定论。尽管最近全内装置的使用有所增加,但多项短期至中期随访研究表明,由内向外修复技术和全内修复技术的半月板愈合率相似。同样,当前文献描述的失败率约为20%,两者相当。并发症情况存在差异,全内装置有更多与植入物相关的并发症,而由内向外技术有更高的神经血管损伤发生率。由内向外半月板修复是一种通用、经济有效的技术,仍然是大多数半月板撕裂类型治疗的金标准。通过深思熟虑的方法,可以在保护关键神经血管结构的同时,高效地进行缝线取出和修复。全内半月板修复装置越来越受欢迎,外科医生也更容易使用,但该技术并非没有局限性,与由内向外半月板修复相比,结果并不明确。