• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向环境正义的中国大气污染联防联控收益分配模型

A benefit allocation model for the joint prevention and control of air pollution in China: In view of environmental justice.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300401, Tianjin Province, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 1;315:115132. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115132. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115132
PMID:35489189
Abstract

The benefit allocation of fair and justice is an inevitable guarantee for the long-term operation of the joint prevention and control of air pollution (JPCAP). The ignorance of interest demands of various governance subjects in the existing benefit allocation mechanism results in the widespread "free rider" behavior in the joint control and unsatisfactory effects of JPCAP. Given this, it is imperative to build a reasonable benefit allocation model. The innovation of this paper is proposing a benefit allocation model of JPCAP to achieve the symmetry between control costs and benefits based on environmental justice. The control objectives and total benefits of JPCAP are calculated through the adjustment of optimal removal rates. The interest demands of various control subjects and benefit compensation scheme are clarified by adopting an improved Shapley method, which comprehensively considers factors affecting environmental justice. An empirical analysis is conducted on SO governance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) and its surrounding areas. The results show that the benefit allocation model based on environmental justice can not only accurately evaluate the benefits of joint control, but also effectively achieve the symmetry between control costs and benefits. This study provides a scientific and reasonable theoretical basis for the benefit allocation of SO control and can be extended to the researches and practices of other air pollutants control.

摘要

公平与正义的利益分配是大气污染联防联控(JPCAP)长期运行的必然保障。现有利益分配机制中各治理主体利益诉求的忽视,导致联合治理中广泛存在“搭便车”行为,JPCAP 效果不佳。鉴于此,构建合理的利益分配模型势在必行。本文的创新之处在于提出了一种基于环境正义的 JPCAP 利益分配模型,以实现控制成本与效益之间的对称。通过调整最优去除率来计算 JPCAP 的控制目标和总效益。采用改进的 Shapley 方法明确了各控制主体的利益诉求和利益补偿方案,综合考虑了影响环境正义的因素。对京津冀及周边地区 SO 治理进行了实证分析。结果表明,基于环境正义的利益分配模型不仅可以准确评估联合控制的效益,还可以有效地实现控制成本与效益的对称。本研究为 SO 控制的利益分配提供了科学合理的理论依据,可推广应用于其他大气污染物控制的研究与实践。

相似文献

1
A benefit allocation model for the joint prevention and control of air pollution in China: In view of environmental justice.面向环境正义的中国大气污染联防联控收益分配模型
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 1;315:115132. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115132. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
A new method for dividing the scopes and priorities of air pollution control based on environmental justice.基于环境正义的空气污染控制范围和优先级划分的新方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(10):12858-12869. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11160-w. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
3
Reflection on the joint prevention and control of air pollution from the perspective of environmental justice-insights from a two-stage dynamic game model.从环境正义视角反思空气污染联防联控——基于两阶段动态博弈模型的洞察
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(27):40550-40566. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17911-7. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
4
Air quality improvement and health benefit of PM reduction from the coal cap policy in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, China.中国京津冀地区实施煤炭总量控制政策对空气质量改善和健康效益的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(32):32709-32720. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3014-y. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
5
Effects of the joint prevention and control of atmospheric pollution policy on air pollutants-A quantitative analysis of Chinese policy texts.大气污染协同防控政策对空气污染物的影响——基于中国政策文本的定量分析。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 15;300:113721. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113721. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
6
Analysis of the impact of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development on environmental pollution and its mechanism.京津冀协同发展对环境污染的影响及其作用机制分析。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Jan 13;194(2):91. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09720-9.
7
Are the Benefits of a High-Emission Vehicle Driving Area Restriction Policy Greater than the Costs?高排放车辆行驶区域限制政策的收益是否大于成本?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 27;19(23):15789. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315789.
8
"APEC blue"--The effects and implications of joint pollution prevention and control program.“APEC蓝”——联防联控计划的成效与启示
Sci Total Environ. 2016 May 15;553:429-438. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.122. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
9
An interpretable prediction of FCM driven by small samples for energy analysis based on air quality prediction.基于空气质量预测的能源分析中,由小样本驱动的 FCM 的可解释预测。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Sep;72(9):985-999. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2022.2064006. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
10
Predicted impact of thermal power generation emission control measures in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region on air pollution over Beijing, China.预测京津冀地区火力发电排放控制措施对中国北京地区空气污染的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 17;8(1):934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19481-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Calculation and Allocation of Atmospheric Environment Governance Cost in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China.中国长江经济带大气环境治理成本的核算与分配
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054281.