Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2022 Jul 1;174:106197. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106197. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
Swallowing oral solid dosage forms is challenging in patients with dysphagia who are at risk of aspiration or choking. The most common method to facilitate drug administration in dysphagia patients is to mix the powdered drug with a small amount of thickened water, however little is known about the effects of this method on in vivo bioavailability of drugs. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of thickened liquids on dissolution rate and bioavailability of levetiracetam as a model drug. Powdered commercial tablets of levetiracetam, carbamazepine, atenolol and cefixime were mixed with water thickened with two commercial thickeners, modified maize starch (MS) and xanthan gam (XG), at three thickness levels: nectar, honey and pudding in test groups, and mixed with only water in the control group. At the first stage, the effects of thickened water on in vitro drug release of 4 drugs (levetiracetam, carbamazepine, atenolol and cefixime) were tested by using dialysis membrane method. Addition of both thickeners significantly reduced the release of three drugs compared to the control group, except carbamazepine. Levetiracetam which had the highest solubility was chosen as the model drug for in vivo experiments. In the second stage, New Zealand albino female rabbits (n=24) were divided into two groups as: control group (water+drug, n=6) and test group (thickened water+drug, n=18). Powdered levetiracetam tablets were mixed with water thickened with XG (n=9, 1.2%, 2.4%, 3.6%) and MS (n=9, 4%, 6%, 8%) at three thickness levels and administered to the rabbits by intragastric gavage. Blood samples were collected at 9 time points following administration. After two-weeks of wash-out, test groups were crossed over and sample collection was repeated. Blood samples were analysed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). An in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) model was developed using in vitro drug dissolution (%) and in vivo plasma concentrations of levetiracetam for control group and test groups. The peak plasma concentration (C) was lower and time to reach C (t) was relatively higher in test groups compared to control group. The lowest C was detected at the highest thickness level, however, the differences between groups were not statistically significant (p=0.117 and p=0.495 for C and t, respectively). No significant difference in total amount of levetiracetam absorbed (AUC) was found between groups (p=0.215 and p=0.183 for AUC and AUC, respectively). The comparisons according to the type of thickener also revealed that pharmacokinetic parameters did not significantly differ between groups, except for a significantly lower C when drug was mixed with MS-thickened water at nectar consistency (1.2%) compared to drug mixed with XG (4%) at the same thickness level (p=0.038). A good correlation was observed between in vitro and in vivo data, which was characterized by higher r values as the concentration of the thickening agents was increased, but not for all thickness levels studied, indicating an inability of this in vitro model to fully predict the in vivo response. These results suggest that regardless of the thickness level, the administration of levetiracetam with two commercial thickening agents commonly used in dysphagia for safe swallowing, do not affect the pharmacokinetic efficiency and thus, the bioavailability of the drug.
吞咽固体口服剂型对于有吞咽困难且有窒息风险的患者来说是一项挑战。在吞咽困难患者中,最常见的给药方法是将粉末状药物与少量增稠水混合,但对于这种方法对药物体内生物利用度的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在评估增稠液对左乙拉西坦作为模型药物的溶解速率和生物利用度的影响。将左乙拉西坦、卡马西平、阿替洛尔和头孢克肟的商业片剂粉末与两种商业增稠剂(改性玉米淀粉(MS)和黄原胶(XG))在三个稠度水平(花蜜、蜂蜜和布丁)的增稠水中混合,在测试组中,而在对照组中仅与水混合。在第一阶段,通过使用透析膜法测试了增稠水对 4 种药物(左乙拉西坦、卡马西平、阿替洛尔和头孢克肟)的体外药物释放的影响。与对照组相比,除了卡马西平外,两种增稠剂都显著降低了三种药物的释放。具有最高溶解度的左乙拉西坦被选为体内实验的模型药物。在第二阶段,将新西兰白化雌性兔(n=24)分为两组:对照组(水+药物,n=6)和试验组(增稠水+药物,n=18)。将左乙拉西坦片剂粉末与 XG(n=9,1.2%、2.4%、3.6%)和 MS(n=9,4%、6%、8%)增稠水在三个稠度水平下混合,并通过灌胃给予兔子。给药后 9 个时间点采集血样。经过两周的洗脱期,交叉试验组并重复取样。使用液质联用(LC-MS/MS)法分析血样。使用对照组和试验组的体外药物溶解(%)和体内左乙拉西坦血浆浓度建立了体外-体内相关性(IVIVC)模型。与对照组相比,试验组的峰血浆浓度(C)更低,达到 C 的时间(t)相对较长。在最高稠度水平下检测到最低的 C,但组间差异无统计学意义(C:p=0.117,t:p=0.495)。组间总左乙拉西坦吸收量(AUC)无显著差异(AUC:p=0.215,AUC:p=0.183)。根据增稠剂的类型进行比较也表明,除了当药物与 MS 增稠水(1.2%)混合时 C 明显低于与 XG (4%)混合时(p=0.038)外,各组之间的药代动力学参数无明显差异。观察到体外和体内数据之间存在良好的相关性,这表现为随着增稠剂浓度的增加 r 值更高,但并非所有研究的稠度水平均如此,表明该体外模型无法完全预测体内反应。这些结果表明,无论稠度水平如何,使用两种常用于吞咽困难安全吞咽的商业增稠剂给予左乙拉西坦不会影响药物的药代动力学效率,从而不会影响其生物利用度。