Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性观察研究中对危重症儿科患者进行美罗培南的治疗药物监测及药代动力学/药效学目标评估。

Therapeutic drug monitoring of meropenem and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target assessment in critically ill pediatric patients from a prospective observational study.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenomics Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;120:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.04.052. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the unbound plasma meropenem concentrations at mid-dosing intervals (C, 50%fT), end-dosing intervals (C, 100%fT), and proportions of patients achieving 50%fT and 100%fT above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (50%fT and 100%fT) between extended infusion (EI) and intermittent bolus (IB) administration in a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program in children.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted in children aged 1 month to 18 years receiving meropenem every 8 hours by either EI or IB. Meropenem C, C, and proportions of patients achieving 50%fT and 100%fT were compared.

RESULTS

TDM data from 72 patients with a median age (interquartile range [IQR]) of 12 months (3-37) were used. Meropenem dose was 120 and 60 mg/kg/day in EI and IB groups, respectively. Geometric mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) C of EI versus IB was 17.3 mg/L (13.7-21.8) versus 3.4 mg/L (1.7-6.7) (P <0.001). Geometric mean (95% CI) C of EI versus IB was 2.3 mg/L (1.6-3.4) versus 0.8 mg/L (0.4-1.5) (P=0.005). Greater proportions of patients achieving 50%fT and 100%fT were observed in the EI group.

CONCLUSIONS

A meropenem dose of 20 mg/kg/dose given by IB should not be used in critically ill children, even if they are not suspected of having a central nervous system infection. A dose of 40 mg/kg/dose given by EI resulted in higher C, C, and proportions of patients achieving 50%fT and 100%fT.

摘要

目的

比较在治疗药物监测(TDM)程序中,对于接受每 8 小时一次的美罗培南治疗的 1 个月至 18 岁儿童,与间断推注(IB)相比,延长输注(EI)给药时,在中剂量间隔(C,50%fT)、末剂量间隔(C,100%fT)时的游离血浆美罗培南浓度(C),以及达到最低抑菌浓度(MIC)以上 50%fT 和 100%fT 的患者比例(50%fT 和 100%fT)。

方法

对接受每 8 小时一次 EI 或 IB 给药的美罗培南治疗的 1 个月至 18 岁儿童进行前瞻性观察性研究。比较 C、C 和达到 50%fT 和 100%fT 的患者比例。

结果

共纳入 72 例患儿的 TDM 数据,中位年龄(四分位距[IQR])为 12 个月(3-37)。EI 和 IB 组的美罗培南剂量分别为 120 和 60mg/kg/日。EI 组与 IB 组的几何均数(95%置信区间[CI])C 分别为 17.3mg/L(13.7-21.8)与 3.4mg/L(1.7-6.7)(P<0.001)。EI 组与 IB 组的 C 几何均数(95%CI)分别为 2.3mg/L(1.6-3.4)与 0.8mg/L(0.4-1.5)(P=0.005)。在 EI 组中,达到 50%fT 和 100%fT 的患者比例更高。

结论

对于重症患儿,即使没有中枢神经系统感染的怀疑,也不应该使用 IB 给予美罗培南 20mg/kg/剂量。给予 EI 的 40mg/kg/剂量可导致更高的 C、C 和达到 50%fT 和 100%fT 的患者比例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验