• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有助于提高疫苗接种率的公开辩论:范围综述和趋同交叉映射。

Open Debates Conducive for Vaccination Rate Flatlines: A Scoping Review and Convergent Cross Mapping.

机构信息

School of Computer and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:830933. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.830933. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.830933
PMID:35493379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9047174/
Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic is fueling digital health transformation-accelerating innovations of digital health services, surveillance, and interventions, whereas hastening social contagion of deliberate infodemic. The USA and many other countries are experiencing a resurgent wave of the COVID-19 pandemic with vaccination rate slowdown, making policymaking fraught with challenges. Political leaders and scientists have publicly warned of a "pandemic of the unvaccinated," reinforcing their calls for citizens to get jabs. However, some scientists accused elites of stigmatizing the unvaccinated people and undermining the moral pillars of public health. Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we first reviewed the nuances of stakeholders involved in the ongoing debates and revealed the potential consequences of divisive pronouncements to provide perspectives to reframe extensible discussions. Then, we employed the convergent cross mapping (CCM) model to reveal the uncharted knock-on effects of the contentious tsunami in a stakeholders-oriented policymaking framework, coupled with rich metadata from the GDELT project and Google Trends. Our experimental findings suggest that current news coverage may shape the mindsets of the vaccines against the unvaccinated, thereby exacerbating the risk of dualistic antagonism in algorithmically infused societies. Finally, we briefly summarized how open debates are conducive to increasing vaccination rates and bolstering the outcomes of impending policies for pandemic preparedness.

摘要

新冠疫情正在推动数字健康转型——加速数字健康服务、监测和干预措施的创新,同时也加速了故意制造虚假信息的“信息疫情”的传播。美国和许多其他国家正在经历新冠疫情的反弹,疫苗接种率放缓,这使得政策制定充满挑战。政治领导人和科学家公开警告称存在“未接种疫苗者的疫情”,这进一步强化了他们呼吁民众接种疫苗的声音。然而,一些科学家指责精英阶层污名化未接种疫苗的人群,并破坏了公共卫生的道德支柱。根据 PRISMA-ScR 指南,我们首先回顾了参与当前辩论的利益相关者的细微差别,并揭示了分裂言论可能带来的潜在后果,以提供重新构建可扩展讨论的视角。然后,我们使用收敛交叉映射(CCM)模型,在以利益相关者为导向的决策框架中揭示有争议的海啸的未知连锁影响,同时结合来自 GDELT 项目和谷歌趋势的丰富元数据。我们的实验结果表明,当前的新闻报道可能会影响人们对疫苗和未接种疫苗者的看法,从而加剧算法驱动社会中二元对立对抗的风险。最后,我们简要总结了公开辩论如何有助于提高疫苗接种率,并为即将到来的大流行防范政策的结果提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f175/9047174/72600ca8c972/fpubh-10-830933-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f175/9047174/f9b1e5922e9e/fpubh-10-830933-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f175/9047174/7411ca35aaa6/fpubh-10-830933-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f175/9047174/72600ca8c972/fpubh-10-830933-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f175/9047174/f9b1e5922e9e/fpubh-10-830933-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f175/9047174/7411ca35aaa6/fpubh-10-830933-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f175/9047174/72600ca8c972/fpubh-10-830933-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Open Debates Conducive for Vaccination Rate Flatlines: A Scoping Review and Convergent Cross Mapping.有助于提高疫苗接种率的公开辩论:范围综述和趋同交叉映射。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:830933. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.830933. eCollection 2022.
2
Interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review.干预措施以提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD015270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015270.
3
A Cross-sectional Survey of Public Knowledge and Perspective on Coronavirus Disease, Vaccination, and Related Research in India during the COVID-19 Pandemic.印度 COVID-19 大流行期间对冠状病毒病、疫苗接种和相关研究的公众知识和观点的横断面调查。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2023 Sep;71(9):19-27. doi: 10.59556/japi.71.0335.
4
Historical narratives about the COVID-19 pandemic are motivationally biased.关于 COVID-19 大流行的历史叙述存在动机偏差。
Nature. 2023 Nov;623(7987):588-593. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06674-5. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
5
Papers Please - Predictive Factors of National and International Attitudes Toward Immunity and Vaccination Passports: Online Representative Surveys.请出示文件 - 免疫和疫苗接种护照的国内外态度的预测因素:在线代表性调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jul 15;8(7):e32969. doi: 10.2196/32969.
6
Effects of COVID-19 Illness and Vaccination Infodemic Through Mobile Health, Social Media, and Electronic Media on the Attitudes of Caregivers and Health Care Providers in Pakistan: Qualitative Exploratory Study.新冠疫情疾病和疫苗信息疫情通过移动健康、社交媒体和电子媒体对巴基斯坦护理人员和医疗保健提供者态度的影响:定性探索性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Sep 4;4:e49366. doi: 10.2196/49366.
7
Discriminatory attitudes against unvaccinated people during the pandemic.疫情期间对未接种疫苗者的歧视态度。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):704-711. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05607-y. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
8
Short- and Long-Term Predicted and Witnessed Consequences of Digital Surveillance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.新冠疫情期间数字监控的短期和长期预测及见证后果:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 24;10:e47154. doi: 10.2196/47154.
9
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Digital Pandemic Surveillance in Germany (eCOV Study): Web Application-Based Prospective Observational Cohort Study.德国 COVID-19 疫苗有效性和数字大流行监测(eCOV 研究):基于网络应用的前瞻性观察队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 4;26:e47070. doi: 10.2196/47070.
10
Media Reporting Relating to COVID-19 Vaccination as a Driver of Vaccine Hesitancy Prior to the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in India: A Content Analysis of Newspaper and Digital Media Reports.在印度第二波新冠疫情大流行之前,媒体对新冠疫苗接种的报道成为疫苗犹豫的一个驱动因素:报纸和数字媒体报道的内容分析
Cureus. 2023 Mar 27;15(3):e36750. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36750. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Delta variants-Current status and implications as of August 2021.2019冠状病毒病德尔塔变异株——截至2021年8月的现状及影响
Precis Clin Med. 2021 Sep 20;4(4):287-292. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbab024. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Sources of Vaccine Hesitancy: Pregnancy, Infertility, Minority Concerns, and General Skepticism.疫苗犹豫的根源:怀孕、不孕、少数群体担忧及普遍怀疑态度。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 18;9(3):ofab433. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab433. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
COVID-19: 'A pandemic of the unvaccinated'? - compassion fatigue among healthcare professionals in South Africa.
新冠疫情:“未接种疫苗者的大流行”?——南非医护人员的同情疲劳
S Afr Med J. 2021 Oct 4;111(11):1040-1041.
4
Heavily mutated Omicron variant puts scientists on alert.高度变异的奥密克戎毒株使科学家们警觉起来。
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7887):21. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-03552-w.
5
A Possible Role for Anti-idiotype Antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination.抗独特型抗体在SARS-CoV-2感染和疫苗接种中的潜在作用。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 27;386(4):394-396. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr2113694. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
6
COVID-19: stigmatising the unvaccinated is not justified.新冠疫情:污名化未接种疫苗者是不合理的。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 20;398(10314):1871. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02243-1.
7
Nurses on the wrong side of history: Covid-19 risk minimization, vaccine refusal and social privilege.站在历史错误一边的护士:新冠疫情风险最小化、拒绝接种疫苗与社会特权
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Mar;78(3):e43-e45. doi: 10.1111/jan.15092. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
8
Pandemics past, present, and future: Their impact on oral health care.疫情的过去、现在和未来:对口腔卫生保健的影响。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Dec;152(12):972-980. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.09.008. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
9
Should COVID-19 vaccination be mandatory?新冠疫苗接种应该强制实行吗?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Dec;26(6):269-270. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111813. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
Vaccines and Variants, Valiance and Variance.疫苗与变体,效力与差异。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2021 Oct;80(10 Suppl 2):6-9.