Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:829176. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.829176. eCollection 2022.
As the epidemic progresses, universal vaccination against COVID-19 has been the trend, but there are still some doubts about the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents, children, and even infants.
To evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in the population aged 0-17 years.
A comprehensive search for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to November 9, 2021. All data were pooled by RevMan 5.3 statistical software, with risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval as the effect measure. This study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021290205).
There was a total of six randomized controlled trials included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, enrolling participants in the age range of 3-17 years, and containing three types of COVID-19 vaccines. Compared with mRNA vaccines and adenovirus vector vaccines, inactivated vaccines have a more satisfactory safety profile, both after initial (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.90, = 0.03) and booster (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.20-2.81, = 0.005) vaccination. The risk of adverse reactions was significantly increased after the first and second doses, but there was no significant difference between the first two doses (RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.99-1.02, = 0.60). Nevertheless, the two-dose regimen is obviously superior to the single-dose schedule for immunogenicity and efficacy. After booster vaccination, both neutralizing antibodies (RR 144.80, 95%CI 44.97-466.24, < 0.00001) and RBD-binding antibodies (RR 101.50, 95%CI 6.44-1,600.76, = 0.001) reach optimal levels, but the cellular immune response seemed not to be further enhanced. In addition, compared with younger children, older children and adolescents were at significantly increased risk of adverse reactions after vaccination, with either mRNA or inactivated vaccines, accompanied by a stronger immune response.
The available evidence suggests that the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines are acceptable in people aged 3-17 years. However, there is an urgent need for additional multicenter, large-sample studies, especially in younger children under 3 years of age and even in infants, with long-term follow-up data.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021290205, identifier: CRD42021290205.
随着疫情的发展,新冠疫苗的全民接种已成趋势,但针对青少年、儿童,甚至婴儿人群,新冠疫苗的疗效和安全性仍存在一些疑问。
评估 0-17 岁人群中新冠疫苗的安全性、免疫原性和有效性。
全面检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆自成立至 2021 年 11 月 9 日的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。采用 RevMan 5.3 统计软件汇总所有数据,以风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间作为效应量。本研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42021290205)上注册。
本系统评价和荟萃分析共纳入 6 项 RCT,纳入研究对象的年龄范围为 3-17 岁,包含 3 种类型的新冠疫苗。与 mRNA 疫苗和腺病毒载体疫苗相比,灭活疫苗具有更令人满意的安全性,初始(RR 1.40,95%CI 1.04-1.90, = 0.03)和加强(RR 1.84,95%CI 1.20-2.81, = 0.005)接种后均如此。首次和第二次接种后,不良反应风险明显增加,但前两剂之间无显著差异(RR 1.00,95%CI 0.99-1.02, = 0.60)。然而,两剂方案在免疫原性和疗效方面明显优于单剂方案。加强接种后,中和抗体(RR 144.80,95%CI 44.97-466.24, < 0.00001)和 RBD 结合抗体(RR 101.50,95%CI 6.44-1,600.76, = 0.001)均达到最佳水平,但细胞免疫反应似乎没有进一步增强。此外,与年龄较小的儿童相比,年龄较大的儿童和青少年在接种后发生不良反应的风险显著增加,无论使用 mRNA 疫苗还是灭活疫苗,其免疫反应均更强。
现有证据表明,3-17 岁人群接种新冠疫苗具有良好的安全性、免疫原性和有效性。然而,仍需要更多的多中心、大样本研究,特别是在 3 岁以下的幼儿甚至婴儿中,需要进行长期随访。
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021290205,标识符:CRD42021290205。