Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Immunol. 2022 Apr 13;13:845301. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.845301. eCollection 2022.
The role of the complement system in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is insufficiently understood. We aimed to investigate the role of local and systemic complement activation in active (aABMR). We quantified complement activation markers, C3, C3d, and C5b-9 in plasma of aABMR, and acute T-cell mediated rejection (aTCMR), and non-rejection kidney transplant recipients. Intra-renal complement markers were analyzed as C4d, C3d, C5b-9, and CD59 deposition. We examined complement activation and CD59 expression on renal endothelial cells upon incubation with human leukocyte antigen antibodies.
We included 50 kidney transplant recipients, who we histopathologically classified as aABMR (n=17), aTCMR (n=18), and non-rejection patients (n=15).
Complement activation in plasma did not differ across groups. C3d and C4d deposition were discriminative for aABMR diagnosis. Particularly, C3d deposition was stronger in glomerular (P<0,01), and peritubular capillaries (P<0,05) comparing aABMR to aTCMR rejection and non-rejection biopsies. In contrast to C3d, C5b-9 was only mildly expressed across all groups. For C5b-9, no significant difference between aABMR and non-rejection biopsies regarding peritubular and glomerular C5b-9 deposition was evident. We replicated these findings using renal endothelial cells and found complement pathway activation with C4d and C3d, but without terminal C5b-9 deposition. Complement regulator CD59 was variably present in biopsies and constitutively expressed on renal endothelial cells .
Our results indicate that terminal complement might only play a minor role in late aABMR, possibly indicating the need to re-evaluate the applicability of terminal complement inhibitors as treatment for aABMR.
补体系统在抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)中的作用尚未完全阐明。我们旨在研究局部和全身补体激活在活跃性 ABMR(aABMR)中的作用。我们定量检测了 aABMR、急性 T 细胞介导的排斥反应(aTCMR)和非排斥性肾移植受者血浆中的补体激活标志物 C3、C3d 和 C5b-9。我们分析了肾内补体标志物 C4d、C3d、C5b-9 和 CD59 的沉积。我们研究了在与人白细胞抗原抗体孵育时肾内皮细胞上的补体激活和 CD59 表达。
我们纳入了 50 名肾移植受者,根据组织病理学将其分类为 aABMR(n=17)、aTCMR(n=18)和非排斥受者(n=15)。
血浆中的补体激活在各组之间没有差异。C3d 和 C4d 的沉积对 aABMR 的诊断具有鉴别作用。特别是,与 aTCMR 排斥和非排斥活检相比,C3d 沉积在肾小球(P<0.01)和肾小管周围毛细血管(P<0.05)中更强。与 C3d 不同,C5b-9 在所有组中表达都较弱。对于 C5b-9,aABMR 与非排斥活检之间在肾小管周围和肾小球 C5b-9 沉积方面没有明显差异。使用肾内皮细胞复制了这些发现,并发现补体途径激活伴有 C4d 和 C3d,但没有终末 C5b-9 沉积。补体调节蛋白 CD59 在活检中存在差异,在肾内皮细胞中持续表达。
我们的结果表明,终末补体在晚期 aABMR 中可能仅起次要作用,这可能表明需要重新评估终末补体抑制剂作为 aABMR 治疗的适用性。