Alkaff Firas F, Talen Grietje G, van den Heuvel Marius C, Volbeda Meint, van Meurs Matijs, Moser Jill, Daha Mohamed R, van den Born Jacob, Berger Stefan P
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Division of Pharmacology and Therapy, Department of Anatomy, Histology, and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 Apr 21;10(7):2284-2295. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.04.027. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Previous studies have shown that the complement system plays an important role in COVID-19 acute kidney injury (AKI). However, studies evaluating the activation pathways are scarce and have shown contradictory findings. It has also been suggested that COVID-19 AKI has a pathophysiology similar to that of bacterial sepsis AKI. Nonetheless, no study has compared the complement activation between these 2 types of AKI.
This study used postmortem kidney tissue from 22 patients with COVID-19 and 22 patients with bacterial sepsis. Control kidney tissues were obtained from 12 patients who underwent total nephrectomy. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for complement factor properdin and complement activation products C4d, C3d, and C5b-9. Glomerular and tubulointerstitial complement deposition was quantitatively analyzed using ImageScope.
Peritubular capillary thrombi were found in 82% of the biopsies in the COVID-19 group but were absent in the bacterial sepsis group. Both C3d and properdin positivity in the tubulointerstitial area were significantly higher in COVID-19 than in bacterial sepsis ( = 0.034 and = 0.001, respectively) and in the control group ( = 0.034 and < 0.001, respectively) and were predominantly found in the peritubular capillaries. In contrast, no difference was found in tubulointerstitial C4d and C5b-9 positivity between the COVID-19 and the bacterial sepsis groups.
There was marked tubulointerstitial complement deposition in the kidneys of patients with COVID-19, particularly in the peritubular capillaries, with activation via the alternative pathway. Thus, alternative complement pathway inhibition might be a possible treatment option for patients with COVID-19 AKI.
既往研究表明,补体系统在新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)急性肾损伤(AKI)中起重要作用。然而,评估补体激活途径的研究较少,且结果相互矛盾。也有研究提示,COVID-19 AKI的病理生理学与细菌性脓毒症AKI相似。尽管如此,尚无研究比较这两种类型AKI之间的补体激活情况。
本研究使用了22例COVID-19患者和22例细菌性脓毒症患者的尸检肾组织。对照肾组织取自12例行全肾切除术的患者。对补体因子备解素及补体激活产物C4d、C3d和C5b-9进行免疫组织化学染色。使用ImageScope对肾小球和肾小管间质的补体沉积进行定量分析。
COVID-19组82%的活检组织中发现肾小管周围毛细血管血栓形成,而细菌性脓毒症组未发现。COVID-19组肾小管间质区域的C3d和备解素阳性率均显著高于细菌性脓毒症组(分别为P = 0.034和P = 0.001)及对照组(分别为P = 0.034和P < 0.001),且主要见于肾小管周围毛细血管。相比之下,COVID-19组和细菌性脓毒症组之间肾小管间质C4d和C5b-9阳性率无差异。
COVID-19患者肾脏存在明显的肾小管间质补体沉积,尤其是在肾小管周围毛细血管,通过替代途径激活。因此,抑制替代补体途径可能是COVID-19 AKI患者的一种潜在治疗选择。