Suppr超能文献

在接受乳房切除术且前哨淋巴结活检冰冻切片为假阴性的乳腺癌患者中,可省略腋窝淋巴结清扫术。

Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Can Be Omitted in Breast Cancer Patients With Mastectomy and False-Negative Frozen Section in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.

作者信息

Si Jing, Guo Rong, Pan Huan, Lu Xiang, Guo Zhiqin, Han Chao, Xue Li, Xing Dan, Wu Wanxin, Chen Caiping

机构信息

Department of Breast Disease, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.

Cancer Research Center, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 14;12:869864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.869864. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The IBCSG 23-01 and AMAROS trials both reported that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) did not change survival rates in breast cancer patients with positive nodes detected by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The aim of this study was to determine whether breast cancer patients with mastectomy and false-negative frozen section (FS) in SLNB could forgo ALND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of cN0 patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer treated by mastectomy and SLNB at our institute between January 2010 and December 2014. Patients with false-negative FS in SLNB were separated by the following management of axillary lymph node dissection in the non-ALND group (nonprocess or axillary radiation only) and ALND group (with or without radiation).

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients were included, 86 and 126 patients in the non-ALND and ALND groups, respectively. The positive rate of non-sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) was 15.87% (20/126) in the ALND group. In multivariate analysis, we found that patients with larger tumor size (>2 cm) (OR, 1.989; = 0.030) and multifocal lesions (OR, 3.542; = 0.029) tended to receive ALND. The positivity of non-SLNs in the ALND group was associated with SLN macrometastasis (OR, 3.551; = 0.043) and lymphovascular invasion (OR, 6.158; = 0.003). Also, removing more SLNs (≥3) was related to negativity in non-SLNs (OR, 0.255; = 0.016). After a median follow-up of 59.43 months, RFS and OS of the two groups were similar ( = 0.994 and 0.441). In subgroup analysis, we found that 97 patients who met the inclusive criteria of the IBCSG 23-01 trial had similar RFS and OS between the non-ALND and ALND groups ( = 0.856 and 0.298). The positive rate of non-SLNs was 9.62% (5/52). Also, in 174 patients who met the criteria of the AMAROS trial, RFS and OS in the non-ALND and ALND groups were similar ( = 0.930 and 0.616). The positive rate of non-SLNs was 18.27% (19/104).

CONCLUSION

ALND can be carefully omitted in selected breast cancer patients with mastectomy and false-negative FS in SLNB. SLNB is relatively sufficient in the IBCSG 23-01-eligible patients, and axillary radiation was an effective option in the AMAROS-eligible patients.

摘要

背景

国际乳腺癌研究组(IBCSG)23-01试验和腋窝前哨淋巴结转移术后放疗(AMAROS)试验均报告称,对于前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)检测出淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者,腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)并未改变其生存率。本研究的目的是确定接受乳房切除术且SLNB冰冻切片(FS)结果为假阴性的乳腺癌患者是否可以不进行ALND。

材料与方法

这是一项对2010年1月至2014年12月期间在我院接受乳房切除术和SLNB治疗的cN0原发性浸润性乳腺癌患者的回顾性研究。SLNB中FS结果为假阴性的患者根据腋窝淋巴结清扫的以下处理方式分为非ALND组(仅不处理或腋窝放疗)和ALND组(有或无放疗)。

结果

共纳入212例患者,非ALND组和ALND组分别有86例和126例患者。ALND组中非前哨淋巴结(SLN)的阳性率为15.87%(20/126)。在多因素分析中,我们发现肿瘤较大(>2 cm)(比值比[OR],1.989;P = 0.030)和多灶性病变(OR,3.542;P = 0.029)的患者倾向于接受ALND。ALND组中非SLN的阳性与SLN大转移灶(OR,3.551;P = 0.043)和淋巴管浸润(OR,6.158;P = 0.003)相关。此外,切除更多的SLN(≥3个)与非SLN阴性相关(OR,0.255;P = 0.016)。中位随访59.43个月后,两组的无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)相似(P = 0.994和0.441)。在亚组分析中,我们发现符合IBCSG 23-01试验纳入标准的97例患者在非ALND组和ALND组之间的RFS和OS相似(P = 0.856和0.298)。非SLN的阳性率为9.62%(5/52)。此外,在174例符合AMAROS试验标准的患者中,非ALND组和ALND组的RFS和OS相似(P = 0.930和0.616)。非SLN的阳性率为18.27%(19/104)。

结论

对于接受乳房切除术且SLNB中FS结果为假阴性的特定乳腺癌患者,可以谨慎地省略ALND。在符合IBCSG 23-01标准的患者中,SLNB相对足够,而腋窝放疗在符合AMAROS标准的患者中是一种有效的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ae9/9046780/0a3a4c356dee/fonc-12-869864-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验