Xu Li, Yang Jiqiao, Du Zhenggui, Liang Faqing, Xie Yanyan, Long Quanyi, Chen Jie, Zeng Helin, Lv Qing
Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 3;10:588067. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.588067. eCollection 2020.
For sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer, the dual tracer of blue dye and radioisotope with the 10% rule that all nodes with radioactive count of 10% or more of the hottest node should be removed is widely accepted. However, the cut-off point of radioactivity is being questioned for possibly excessive removal of negative nodes.
To compare different percentile rules and optimize the criteria for identifying SLNs, we established a database which prospectively collected the radioactivity, status of blue dye and the pathological results of each SLN in breast cancer patients who successfully underwent SLNB with a combination of methylene blue and radioisotope.
A total of 2,529 SLNs from 1,039 patients were identified from August 2010 to August 2019. 16.4% (414/2,529) positive nodes were removed at a cost of 83.6% (2115/2,529) negative nodes removed excessively. Up to 17.9% (375/2,115) negative nodes were removed as radioactively hot nodes without blue staining. By gradually increasing the threshold by each 10%, the number of negative nodes identified reduced by 18.2% (385/2,115) with only three node-positive patients (1.0%) missed to be identified using the "40% + blue" rule. In patients with ≥ 2 SLNs removed, 12.3% (238/1,942) negative nodes avoided unnecessary removal with only 0.8% (2/239) positive patients missed with the "hottest two + blue" rule.
Our data indicated that the "40% + blue" rule or the "hottest two + blue" rule for SLNB with the dual tracer of blue dye and radioisotope may be considered as a potential alternative rule to minimize extra nodes resected. Nonetheless, it should be validated by prospective trials with long-term follow-up.
对于乳腺癌患者的前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB),广泛采用蓝色染料和放射性同位素双示踪剂,并遵循10%规则,即所有放射性计数达到最热点淋巴结10%或更高的淋巴结均应切除。然而,放射性的截断点正受到质疑,因为可能会过度切除阴性淋巴结。
为了比较不同的百分位数规则并优化前哨淋巴结的识别标准,我们建立了一个数据库,前瞻性收集了成功接受亚甲蓝和放射性同位素联合SLNB的乳腺癌患者的每个前哨淋巴结的放射性、蓝色染料情况及病理结果。
2010年8月至2019年8月共识别出1039例患者的2529个前哨淋巴结。切除了16.4%(414/2529)的阳性淋巴结,代价是过度切除了83.6%(2115/2529)的阴性淋巴结。高达17.9%(375/2115)的阴性淋巴结作为放射性热点淋巴结被切除但无蓝色染色。通过每次提高10%的阈值,识别出的阴性淋巴结数量减少了18.2%(385/2115),使用“40% + 蓝色”规则仅漏诊了3例淋巴结阳性患者(1.0%)。在切除≥2个前哨淋巴结的患者中,12.3%(238/1942)的阴性淋巴结避免了不必要的切除,使用“最热的两个 + 蓝色”规则仅漏诊了0.8%(2/239)的阳性患者。
我们的数据表明,对于使用蓝色染料和放射性同位素双示踪剂的SLNB,“40% + 蓝色”规则或“最热的两个 + 蓝色”规则可被视为尽量减少额外切除淋巴结的潜在替代规则。尽管如此,仍需通过长期随访的前瞻性试验进行验证。