Di Loreto Rai, Getgood Alan, Degen Ryan, Burkhart Timothy A
School of Kinesiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Fowler Kennedy Sports Medicine Clinic, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec 7;4(2):e447-e452. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.022. eCollection 2022 Apr.
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal anchor placement and trajectory when repairing acetabular labral tears during hip arthroscopy with the primary focus on the 12 to 3 o'clock positions on the acetabular rim.
Three-dimensional computational models of the pelvis were generated from 13 cadaveric specimens using 3D slicer medical imaging software. A set of cones, consistent with the dimensions of a commonly used sutured anchor, were virtually embedded into the models at the 12, 1, 2, and 3 o'clock positions around the acetabulum. Mirror images of the cone were extended toward the superficial aspect of the hip. The volume of bone occupied by the virtual anchor, the trajectory angle, and the volume of overlap between adjacent anchor locations were calculated.
Bone volume was significantly greater at the 1 o'clock position (4196.2 [1190.2] mm) compared with all other positions ( < .001). The 3 o'clock position had the smallest volume (629.2 [180.0] mm) and was also significantly less than the 12 ( < .001) and 2 o'clock ( = .014) positions). The trajectory angle of 32.04 [5.05]°) at the 1 o'clock position was significantly greater compared with all other positions ( < .001). The least amount of adjacent position overlap occurred between the 2 and 3 o'clock positions (.12 [.42] mm), and this was statistically smaller than the overlap between cones at the 12 and 1 o'clock positions (214.28 [251.88] mm; = .029) and the 1 and 2 o'clock positions (139.51 [177.14] mm; = .044).
Trajectory angles and the thickness of bone around the acetabulum were the greatest at the 12 to 1 o'clock positions, with the 1 o'clock position identified as that with the largest trajectory angle for safe anchor insertion.
The use of a single, workhorse portal, for anchor insertion may not be recommended and careful selection of a portal allowing a direct approach should be used for anterior anchor insertion.
本研究的目的是确定髋关节镜检查期间修复髋臼唇撕裂时的最佳锚钉放置位置和轨迹,主要关注髋臼边缘12点至3点的位置。
使用3D Slicer医学成像软件从13个尸体标本生成骨盆的三维计算模型。将一组与常用缝合锚钉尺寸一致的圆锥体虚拟嵌入模型中髋臼周围的12点、1点、2点和3点位置。圆锥体的镜像向髋关节的浅表方向延伸。计算虚拟锚钉占据的骨体积、轨迹角度以及相邻锚钉位置之间的重叠体积。
与所有其他位置相比,1点位置的骨体积显著更大(4196.2 [1190.2] mm³;P <.001)。3点位置的体积最小(629.2 [180.0] mm³),也显著小于12点(P <.001)和2点(P = 0.014)位置。1点位置的轨迹角度为32.04 [5.05]°,与所有其他位置相比显著更大(P <.001)。2点和3点位置之间的相邻位置重叠量最少(0.12 [0.42] mm³),在统计学上小于12点和1点位置圆锥体之间的重叠量(214.28 [251.88] mm³;P = 0.029)以及1点和2点位置之间的重叠量(139.51 [177.14] mm³;P = 0.044)。
髋臼周围的轨迹角度和骨厚度在12点至1点位置最大,1点位置被确定为安全插入锚钉时轨迹角度最大的位置。
不建议使用单一的常用入路进行锚钉插入,对于前侧锚钉插入,应谨慎选择允许直接入路的入路。