Yoshifuji Ayumi, Ryuzaki Munekazu, Uehara Yuki, Ohmagari Norio, Kawai Toru, Kanno Yoshihiko, Kikuchi Kan, Kon Hiroshi, Sakai Ken, Shinoda Toshio, Takano Yaoko, Tanaka Junko, Hora Kazuhiko, Nakazawa Yasushi, Hasegawa Naoki, Hanafusa Norio, Hinoshita Fumihiko, Morikane Keita, Wakino Shu, Nakamoto Hidetomo, Takemoto Yoshiaki
Infection Control Committee, The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, 1-4-17 Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0073 Japan.
Ren Replace Ther. 2022;8(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41100-022-00405-8. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who receive dialysis therapy develop more severe disease and have a poorer prognosis than patients who do not. Although various data on the treatment of patients not receiving dialysis therapy have been reported, clinical practice for patients on dialysis is challenging as data is limited. The Infection Control Committee of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy decided to clarify the status of treatment in COVID-19 patients on dialysis.
A questionnaire survey of 105 centers that had treated at least five COVID-19 patients on dialysis was conducted in August 2021.
Sixty-six centers (62.9%) responded to the questionnaire. Antivirals were administered in 27.7% of facilities treating mild disease (most patients received favipiravir) and 66.7% of facilities treating moderate disease (most patients with moderate or more severe conditions received remdesivir). Whether and how remdesivir is administered varies between centers. Steroids were initiated most frequently in moderate II disease (50.8%), while 43.1% of the facilities initiated steroids in mild or moderate I disease. The type of steroid, dose, and the duration of administration were generally consistent, with most facilities administering dexamethasone 6 mg orally or 6.6 mg intravenously for 10 days. Steroid pulse therapy was administered in 48.5% of the facilities, and tocilizumab was administered in 25.8% of the facilities, mainly to patients on ventilators or equivalent medications, or to the cases of exacerbations. Furthermore, some facilities used a polymethylmethacrylate membrane during dialysis, nafamostat as an anticoagulant, and continuous hemodiafiltration in severe cases. There was limited experience of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column-direct hemoperfusion and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The discharge criteria for patients receiving dialysis therapy were longer than those set by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 22.7% of the facilities.
Our survey revealed a variety of treatment practices in each facility. Further evidence and innovations are required to improve the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 receiving dialysis therapy.
接受透析治疗的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者病情更为严重,预后比未接受透析治疗的患者更差。尽管已经报道了关于未接受透析治疗患者的各种治疗数据,但由于数据有限,透析患者的临床实践具有挑战性。日本透析治疗学会感染控制委员会决定阐明COVID-19透析患者的治疗状况。
2021年8月对至少治疗过5例COVID-19透析患者的105个中心进行了问卷调查。
66个中心(62.9%)回复了问卷。在治疗轻症的机构中,27.7%使用了抗病毒药物(大多数患者接受法匹拉韦),在治疗中症的机构中,66.7%使用了抗病毒药物(大多数中症或更严重病情的患者接受瑞德西韦)。各中心在是否使用以及如何使用瑞德西韦方面存在差异。类固醇最常在中症II期疾病中开始使用(50.8%),而43.1%的机构在轻症或中症I期疾病中开始使用类固醇。类固醇的类型、剂量和给药持续时间通常一致,大多数机构口服地塞米松6毫克或静脉注射6.6毫克,持续10天。48.5%的机构进行了类固醇冲击治疗,25.8%的机构使用了托珠单抗,主要用于使用呼吸机或等效药物的患者或病情加重的病例。此外,一些机构在透析期间使用了聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯膜,使用那法莫司作为抗凝剂,在重症病例中使用了连续性血液透析滤过。多粘菌素B固定纤维柱直接血液灌流和体外膜肺氧合的经验有限。22.7%的机构中,接受透析治疗患者的出院标准比厚生劳动省设定的标准更长。
我们的调查揭示了每个机构的各种治疗方法。需要更多证据和创新来改善接受透析治疗的COVID-19患者的预后。