Payen D M, Brun-Buisson C J, Carli P A, Huet Y, Leviel F, Cinotti L, Chiron B
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Jan;62(1):61-70. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.1.61.
Hemodynamic, gas exchange, and hormonal response induced by application of a 25- to 40-mmHg lower body positive pressure (LBPP), during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 14 +/- 2.5 cmH2O) were studied in nine patients with acute respiratory failure. Compared with PEEP alone, LBPP increased cardiac index (CI) from 3.57 to 4.76 l X min-1 X m-2 (P less than 0.001) in relation to changes in right atrial pressure (RAP) (11 to 16 mmHg; P less than 0.01). Cardiopulmonary blood volume (CPBV) measured in five patients increased during LBPP from 546 +/- 126 to 664 +/- 150 ml (P less than 0.01), with a positive linear relationship between changes in RAP and CPBV (r = 0.88; P less than 0.001). Venous admixture (Qva/QT) decreased with PEEP from 24 to 16% (P less than 0.001) but did not change with LBPP despite the large increase in CI, leading to a marked O2 availability increase (P less than 0.001). Although PEEP induced a significant rise in plasma norepinephrine level (NE) (from 838 +/- 97 to 1008 +/- 139 pg/ml; P less than 0.05), NE was significantly decreased by LBPP to control level (from 1,008 +/- 139 to 794 +/- 124 pg/ml; P less than 0.003). Plasma epinephrine levels were not influenced by PEEP or LBPP. Changes of plasma renin activity (PRA) paralleled those of NE. No change in plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) was recorded. We concluded that LBPP increases venous return and CPBV and counteracts hemodynamic effects of PEEP ventilation, without significant change in Qva/QT. Mechanical ventilation with PEEP stimulates sympathetic activity and PRA apparently by a reflex neuronal mechanism, at least partially inhibited by the loading of cardiopulmonary low-pressure reflex and high-pressure baroreflex. Finally, AVP does not appear to be involved in the acute cardiovascular adaptation to PEEP.
对9例急性呼吸衰竭患者在呼气末正压(PEEP;14±2.5cmH₂O)期间应用25至40mmHg的下体正压(LBPP)所引起的血流动力学、气体交换及激素反应进行了研究。与单纯PEEP相比,LBPP使心脏指数(CI)从3.57升至4.76l·min⁻¹·m⁻²(P<0.001),同时右心房压力(RAP)发生变化(从11至16mmHg;P<0.01)。5例患者测量的心肺血容量(CPBV)在LBPP期间从546±126ml增至664±150ml(P<0.01),RAP变化与CPBV之间呈正线性关系(r = 0.88;P<0.001)。静脉混合血(Qva/QT)随PEEP从24%降至16%(P<0.001),但尽管CI大幅增加,LBPP时Qva/QT未发生变化,导致氧供显著增加(P<0.001)。尽管PEEP使血浆去甲肾上腺素水平(NE)显著升高(从838±97升至1008±139pg/ml;P<0.05),但LBPP使NE显著降至对照水平(从1008±139降至794±124pg/ml;P<0.003)。血浆肾上腺素水平不受PEEP或LBPP影响。血浆肾素活性(PRA)的变化与NE平行。血浆精氨酸血管加压素(AVP)未见变化。我们得出结论,LBPP增加静脉回流和CPBV,并抵消PEEP通气的血流动力学效应,而Qva/QT无显著变化。PEEP机械通气显然通过反射性神经机制刺激交感神经活动和PRA,至少部分被心肺低压反射和高压压力感受器反射的负荷所抑制。最后,AVP似乎未参与对PEEP的急性心血管适应性调节。