Hodgetts Christopher J, McLeish Timothy, Thomas Emily, Walker Bruce F
College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
J Chiropr Med. 2021 Dec;20(4):183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between either hand-eye coordination (HEC) or general self-efficacy (GSE) and spinal-manipulative-therapy (SMT) exam scores. We also measured the interrater reliability of the SMT marking criteria used in our study.
Third-year chiropractic students were recruited from the chiropractic spinal technique course at Murdoch University. They completed an alternate-hand wall-toss test to assess HEC and a questionnaire to evaluate GSE. Linear regression models were used to assess the relationships between HEC and GSE on manual-therapy exam scores. Two assessors scored the examination, allowing the investigation of interrater reliability for the SMT marking criteria.
A total of 33 male and 31 female students, aged 20 to 44 years, completed both the GSE questionnaire and the SMT examination, but only 28 women also completed the HEC test. Male participants had higher scores on both HEC (9.4 additional catches, < 0.001) and SMT (6.7%, = .01) compared to female participants. There was no statistically significant relationship between HEC and SMT ( = .932). However, there was a linear relationship between GSE and SMT when adjusted for sex ( = .032). Furthermore, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the marking criteria was moderate to good, at 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.86).
These preliminary results suggest that when adjusted for sex, a student's GSE may be related to their SMT exam scores. The alternate-hand wall-toss test was not correlated with SMT scores, but other HEC metrics may have a relationship.
本研究旨在调查手眼协调(HEC)或一般自我效能感(GSE)与脊柱手法治疗(SMT)考试成绩之间的关联。我们还测量了本研究中使用的SMT评分标准的评分者间信度。
从莫道克大学的脊椎按摩疗法脊柱技术课程中招募三年级的脊椎按摩专业学生。他们完成了一项单手抛墙测试以评估手眼协调能力,并填写了一份问卷以评估一般自我效能感。使用线性回归模型来评估手眼协调能力和一般自我效能感与手法治疗考试成绩之间的关系。两名评估者对考试进行评分,从而可以对手法治疗评分标准的评分者间信度进行研究。
共有33名男性和31名女性学生,年龄在20至44岁之间,完成了一般自我效能感问卷和手法治疗考试,但只有28名女性也完成了手眼协调测试。与女性参与者相比,男性参与者在手眼协调测试(多接住9.4次,<0.001)和手法治疗考试(高6.7%,=0.01)中的得分更高。手眼协调能力与手法治疗考试成绩之间没有统计学上的显著关系(=0.932)。然而,在对性别进行调整后,一般自我效能感与手法治疗考试成绩之间存在线性关系(=0.032)。此外,评分标准的组内相关系数为中度到良好,为0.77(95%置信区间,0.63 - 0.86)。
这些初步结果表明,在对性别进行调整后,学生的一般自我效能感可能与其手法治疗考试成绩相关。单手抛墙测试与手法治疗考试成绩不相关,但其他手眼协调指标可能存在关联。