Suppr超能文献

作为乒乓球人才识别的一部分,眼手协调测试是否具有附加价值?一项效度和可重复性研究。

Does an eye-hand coordination test have added value as part of talent identification in table tennis? A validity and reproducibility study.

作者信息

Faber Irene R, Oosterveld Frits G J, Nijhuis-Van der Sanden Maria W G

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Activity and Health, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):e85657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085657. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

This study investigated the added value, i.e. discriminative and concurrent validity and reproducibility, of an eye-hand coordination test relevant to table tennis as part of talent identification. Forty-three table tennis players (7-12 years) from national (n = 13), regional (n = 11) and local training centres (n = 19) participated. During the eye-hand coordination test, children needed to throw a ball against a vertical positioned table tennis table with one hand and to catch the ball correctly with the other hand as frequently as possible in 30 seconds. Four different test versions were assessed varying the distance to the table (1 or 2 meter) and using a tennis or table tennis ball. 'Within session' reproducibility was estimated for the two attempts of the initial tests and ten youngsters were retested after 4 weeks to estimate 'between sessions' reproducibility. Validity analyses using age as covariate showed that players from the national and regional centres scored significantly higher than players from the local centre in all test versions (p<0.05). The tests at 1 meter demonstrated better discriminative ability than those at 2 meter. While all tests but one had a positive significant association with competition outcome, which were corrected for age influences, the version with a table tennis ball at 1 meter showed the highest association (r = 0.54; p = 0.001). Differences between the first and second attempts were comparable for all test versions (between -8 and +7 repetitions) with ICC's ranging from 0.72 to 0.87. The smallest differences were found for the test with a table tennis ball at 1 meter (between -3 and +3 repetitions). Best test version as part of talent identification appears to be the version with a table tennis ball at 1 meter regarding the psychometric characteristics evaluated. Longitudinal studies are necessary to evaluate the predictive value of this test.

摘要

本研究调查了一项与乒乓球相关的眼手协调测试作为人才选拔一部分的附加价值,即区分效度、同时效度和可重复性。来自国家(n = 13)、地区(n = 11)和当地训练中心(n = 19)的43名乒乓球运动员(7至12岁)参与了研究。在眼手协调测试中,孩子们需要用一只手将球投向垂直放置的乒乓球桌,并在30秒内用另一只手尽可能频繁地正确接住球。评估了四个不同的测试版本,改变了与桌子的距离(1米或2米)并使用网球或乒乓球。对初始测试的两次尝试评估了“日内”可重复性,10名青少年在4周后重新测试以评估“日间”可重复性。以年龄作为协变量的效度分析表明,在所有测试版本中,国家和地区中心的运动员得分显著高于当地中心的运动员(p<0.05)。1米处的测试比2米处的测试具有更好的区分能力。虽然除一项测试外所有测试与比赛成绩均有显著正相关(已校正年龄影响),但1米处使用乒乓球的版本显示出最高的相关性(r = 0.54;p = 0.001)。所有测试版本第一次和第二次尝试之间的差异相当(在 -8至 +7次重复之间),组内相关系数(ICC)范围为0.72至0.87。1米处使用乒乓球的测试差异最小(在 -3至 +3次重复之间)。就所评估的心理测量特征而言,作为人才选拔一部分的最佳测试版本似乎是1米处使用乒乓球的版本。需要进行纵向研究来评估该测试的预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/3895002/2ce7ec61c95c/pone.0085657.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验