Lombardi Carlo, Berti Alvise, Cottini Marcello
Departmental Unit of Allergology, Immunology & Pulmonary Diseases, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Ospedale Santa Chiara and Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Curr Res Immunol. 2022 Mar 21;3:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.crimmu.2022.03.002. eCollection 2022.
Eosinophils have multiple relevant biological functions, including the maintenance of homeostasis, host defense against infectious agents, innate immunity activities, immune regulation through Th1/Th2 balance, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumorigenic effects. Eosinophils also have a main role in tissue damage through eosinophil-derived cytotoxic mediators that are involved in eosinophilic inflammation, as documented in Th2-high asthma and other eosinophilic-associated inflammatory conditions. Recent evidence shows that these multiple and apparently conflicting functions may be attributed to the existence of different eosinophil subtypes (i.e.: tissue resident and inducible eosinophils). Therapeutic intervention with biological agents that totally deplete tissues and circulating eosinophils or, , maintain a minimal proportion of eosinophils, particularly the tissue-resident ones, could therefore have a very different impact on patients, especially when considering the administration of these therapies for prolonged time. In addition, the characterization of the predominant pathway underlying eosinophilic inflammation by surrogate biomarkers (circulating eosinophils, organ-specific eosinophils levels such as eosinophil count in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, tissue biopsy; total circulating IgE levels, or the use of FeNO) in the single patient with an eosinophilic-associated inflammatory condition could help in choosing the treatment. These observations are crucial in light of the increasing therapeutic armamentarium effective in modulating eosinophilic inflammation through the inhibition in different, yet complementary ways of eosinophil pathways, such as the interleukin-5 one (with mepolizumab, benralizumab, reslizumab) or the interleukin-4/13 one (with dupilumab and lebrikizumab), in severe T2-high asthma as well as in other systemic eosinophilic associated diseases, such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and hypereosinophilic syndrome.
嗜酸性粒细胞具有多种相关生物学功能,包括维持体内稳态、抵御感染因子的宿主防御、固有免疫活动、通过Th1/Th2平衡进行免疫调节、抗炎和抗肿瘤作用。嗜酸性粒细胞还通过参与嗜酸性粒细胞炎症的嗜酸性粒细胞衍生的细胞毒性介质在组织损伤中起主要作用,如在2型炎症水平高的哮喘和其他嗜酸性粒细胞相关炎症性疾病中所见。最近的证据表明,这些多种且明显相互矛盾的功能可能归因于不同嗜酸性粒细胞亚型的存在(即:组织驻留型和诱导型嗜酸性粒细胞)。因此,使用生物制剂进行治疗干预,使组织和循环中的嗜酸性粒细胞完全耗竭,或者维持最低比例的嗜酸性粒细胞,特别是组织驻留型嗜酸性粒细胞,对患者可能会产生非常不同的影响,尤其是在考虑长时间给予这些治疗时。此外,通过替代生物标志物(循环嗜酸性粒细胞、器官特异性嗜酸性粒细胞水平,如痰液、支气管肺泡灌洗、组织活检中的嗜酸性粒细胞计数;总循环IgE水平,或呼出一氧化氮的测定)对患有嗜酸性粒细胞相关炎症性疾病的单个患者中嗜酸性粒细胞炎症的主要途径进行特征化,有助于选择治疗方法。鉴于越来越多的治疗手段可通过以不同但互补的方式抑制嗜酸性粒细胞途径(如白细胞介素-5途径(使用美泊利单抗、贝那利珠单抗、瑞利珠单抗)或白细胞介素-4/13途径(使用度普利尤单抗和乐布利珠单抗))来有效调节嗜酸性粒细胞炎症,在重度2型炎症水平高的哮喘以及其他全身性嗜酸性粒细胞相关疾病,如嗜酸性肉芽肿性多血管炎和高嗜酸性粒细胞综合征中,这些观察结果至关重要。