Thompson Missy, Hoffman Kristine, Blythe Lindsay, Hasler Rachel, Longtain Megan
Department of Health & Human Performance, Fort Lewis College, Durango, CO, United States.
Department of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, United States.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Apr 12;4:768801. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.768801. eCollection 2022.
Modifying stride length and/or foot strike in running results in mechanical alterations associated with injury risk. Stride length and foot strike have often been treated as independent factors that affect running mechanics, but there is evidence to suggest that they may be coupled. The purpose of this study was to determine if foot strike and stride length are coupled in running, and if so, can these variables be independently manipulated? Additionally, we sought to determine how independently and simultaneously manipulating stride length and foot strike influenced running kinematics and kinetics. Fifteen individuals ran over ground with stride lengths +/- 10 % of their preferred stride length while adopting both a fore/mid foot strike and rear foot strike pattern, as well as running with their self-selected stride length and foot strike when the opposite variable was controlled. Three-dimensional motion capture and force plate data were captured synchronously during the manipulated stride length x foot strike trials. The results indicate that foot strike and stride length are coupled, with shorter stride lengths being associated with a F/MFS and longer stride lengths being associated with a RFS pattern. Impact peak magnitude was primarily dependent on foot strike, with a F/MFS pattern reducing the magnitude of the impact peak force regardless of stride length. Peak vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces were found to be primarily dependent on stride length, with longer stride lengths resulting in increased vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces, regardless of foot strike. It is difficult, but possible, to independently manipulate stride length and foot strike. Clinicians should be aware of the coupled changes in stride length and foot strike.
改变跑步时的步幅和/或着地方式会导致与受伤风险相关的力学改变。步幅和着地方式通常被视为影响跑步力学的独立因素,但有证据表明它们可能是相互关联的。本研究的目的是确定在跑步过程中着地方式和步幅是否相互关联,如果是,这些变量能否被独立控制?此外,我们试图确定独立和同时控制步幅和着地方式如何影响跑步的运动学和动力学。15名受试者在地面上跑步,步幅为其偏好步幅的±10%,同时采用前脚掌/中脚掌着地和后脚掌着地模式,以及在控制相反变量时以自我选择的步幅和着地方式跑步。在控制步幅×着地方式的试验中,同步采集三维运动捕捉和测力台数据。结果表明,着地方式和步幅是相互关联的,较短的步幅与前脚掌/中脚掌着地模式相关,较长的步幅与后脚掌着地模式相关。撞击峰值大小主要取决于着地方式,无论步幅如何,前脚掌/中脚掌着地模式都会降低撞击峰值力的大小。发现垂直和水平地面反作用力峰值主要取决于步幅,无论着地方式如何,较长的步幅会导致垂直和水平地面反作用力增加。独立控制步幅和着地方式是困难的,但也是可能的。临床医生应该意识到步幅和着地方式的关联变化。