Medical Oncology Department, Elche University Hospital, Camí Làlmazara s/n, 03203, Elche, Spain.
Molecular Genetics Unit, Elche University Hospital, 03203, Elche, Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Oct;24(10):1924-1931. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02841-8. Epub 2022 May 2.
Cell-free DNA analysis (cfDNA) holds promise for residual disease or tumor burden quantification in colorectal cancer, with reduced costs and diagnostic equipment compared to gold standard-specific tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis.
This prospective case-control study included 46 colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls to perform cfDNA quantification by fluorometry using Quantus Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI) and using cell-free DNA ScreenTape assay (Agilent) and 4200 TapeStation instrument (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). cfDNA quantification results were correlated with stage, clinical and histopathological features.
33 localized (8 stage I, 12 stage II, and 13 stage III) and 13 advanced colorectal cancer patients were included. No differences in cfDNA quantification by fluorometry were demonstrated depending on stage or histopathological features in localized disease patients. Differences in cfDNA quantification by fluorometry could be demonstrated in patients with advanced disease depending on the presence of liver metastases and synchronous or metachronous metastatic disease. Differences in cfDNA quantification by fluorometry could be demonstrated between advanced colorectal cancer patients and both localized disease patients and healthy controls. Secondary cfDNA analysis by electrophoresis, although showing more specificity to measure ctDNA in cfDNA values, could not improve the capacity to detect differences between analyzed a groups beyond previously achieved with fluorometry.
This exploratory analysis of cfDNA based on fluorometry and electrophoresis methods showed promising results discriminating colorectal cancer and non-cancer patients, as well as different colorectal cancer stages and disease profiles. Further studies are needed to increase our knowledge and to help to overcome barriers to broader implementation and applications.
与金标准特异性肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)分析相比,无细胞 DNA 分析(cfDNA)在结直肠癌中具有残留疾病或肿瘤负担定量的潜力,成本和诊断设备都有所降低。
本前瞻性病例对照研究纳入了 46 例结直肠癌患者和健康对照者,使用 Promega 的 Quantus 荧光计(麦迪逊,威斯康星州)通过荧光法进行 cfDNA 定量,使用无细胞 DNA ScreenTape 检测试剂盒(安捷伦)和 4200 TapeStation 仪器(安捷伦科技公司,圣克拉拉,加利福尼亚州,美国)进行 cfDNA 定量。cfDNA 定量结果与分期、临床和组织病理学特征相关。
纳入 33 例局限性(8 例 I 期、12 例 II 期和 13 例 III 期)和 13 例晚期结直肠癌患者。在局限性疾病患者中,荧光法测定的 cfDNA 定量与分期或组织病理学特征无关。在晚期疾病患者中,根据是否存在肝转移和同步或异时转移性疾病,可以显示出荧光法测定的 cfDNA 定量的差异。在晚期结直肠癌患者与局限性疾病患者和健康对照者之间,可以显示出荧光法测定的 cfDNA 定量的差异。电泳法的二次 cfDNA 分析虽然显示出更高的特异性,能够在 cfDNA 值中测量 ctDNA,但不能提高区分分析组之间差异的能力,这一能力已超过荧光法的先前能力。
这项基于荧光法和电泳法的 cfDNA 探索性分析显示出有前景的结果,可以区分结直肠癌和非癌症患者,以及不同的结直肠癌分期和疾病特征。需要进一步的研究来增加我们的知识,并帮助克服广泛实施和应用的障碍。