Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Int J Psychol. 2022 Oct;57(5):629-633. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12852. Epub 2022 May 2.
Previous research on election stress has focused on reacting to stressors that already occurred, whereas the forecasting of future stressors and associated responses have been underexamined. Leveraging the 2018 U.S. mid-term election, we examined anticipatory stress response, operationalised as the within-person association between daily stressors forecasting and negative affect (NA). We also explore whether such responses might be related to time, partisanship and political orientation. Participants were 125 adults in the U.S. who provided 1056 daily reports in a 29-day daily diary study surrounding the election. Results indicated that daily forecasts of election stressors contributed to increased NA independent of election stressor exposure. Election stressor forecasting was more pronounced during pre-election days and the election day than post-election days, as well as greater in conservatives than liberals. Coping with anticipatory stress may be important for managing election stress.
先前关于选举压力的研究主要集中在对已经发生的压力源的反应上,而对未来压力源及其相关反应的预测则研究不足。利用 2018 年美国中期选举,我们研究了预期压力反应,将其操作化为每日压力源预测与负面情绪(NA)之间的个体内关联。我们还探讨了这些反应是否与时间、党派和政治倾向有关。参与者是美国的 125 名成年人,他们在围绕选举的 29 天的每日日记研究中提供了 1056 份每日报告。结果表明,选举压力源的每日预测会导致 NA 的增加,而与选举压力源的暴露无关。选举压力源的预测在选举前几天和选举日比选举后几天更为明显,保守派比自由派更为明显。应对预期压力可能对管理选举压力很重要。