Feasibility of combining pelvic reconstruction with gynecologic oncology-related surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

At our institution, every patient seen by the gynecologic oncology service is screened for pelvic floor dysfunction. This study was aimed at determining if a combined surgical approach by gynecologic oncology and urogynecology services at our institution was feasible and safe for this patient population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing combined surgery by gynecologic oncology and urogynecology services at our institution from 2013 to 2021. Perioperative variables, postoperative adverse events, and long-term outcomes were assessed, and descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

From 20 December 2013 to 29 January 2021, a total of 102 patients underwent concurrent surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence. Seventy-three patients (71.6%) had normal/benign pathologic conditions, and 29 (28.4%) had premalignant/malignant pathologic conditions. Ten patients (9.8%) had a postoperative complication, including reoperation for exposed midurethral sling (4.9%), urinary retention requiring midurethral sling release (2.9%), reoperation for hemoperitoneum (1.0%), and anemia requiring blood transfusion (1.0%). Nine complications occurred in patients with benign/normal pathologic conditions (12.3%), and one complication occurred in patients with pre-malignant/malignant pathologic conditions (3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our single-institution experience, concurrent gynecologic oncology and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery were safe and feasible in combination with no reported major morbidity events.