Department of Social Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Oct;61(4):1418-1438. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12543. Epub 2022 May 2.
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been widespread conversations about the origins of the virus and who to blame for it. This article focuses on the online hate directed at Chinese and Asian people during the pandemic. Taking a critical discursive psychological approach, we analysed seven online threads related to COVID-19 and China from two Finnish websites (Suomi24 and Ylilauta) and one US (8kun) site. We identified three discursive trends associated with dehumanising Chinese populations: 'monstrous Chinese', 'immoral Chinese' and 'China as a threat', which created different forms of dehumanisation on a continuum from harsher dehumanisation to milder depersonalisation. The animalistic metaphors, coarse language, humorous frames and conspiracy beliefs worked to rhetorically justify the dehumanisation of Chinese individuals, making it more acceptable to portray them as a homogeneous and inhumane mass of people that deserves to be attacked. This study contributes to the field of discursive research on dehumanisation by deepening our knowledge of the specific features of Sinophobic hate speech.
自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来,人们就该病毒的起源以及应该归咎于谁展开了广泛的讨论。本文重点关注大流行期间针对中国和亚洲人的网络仇恨。我们采用批判性话语心理学方法,分析了来自芬兰的两个网站(Suomi24 和 Ylilauta)和一个美国(8kun)网站的与 COVID-19 和中国相关的七个在线帖子。我们确定了与去人性化中国人口相关的三种话语趋势:“可怕的中国人”、“不道德的中国人”和“中国是威胁”,这些趋势在从更严厉的去人性化到更温和的去个性化的连续体上产生了不同形式的去人性化。动物隐喻、粗言秽语、幽默框架和阴谋论信念在修辞上为去人性化中国人辩护,使人们更能接受将他们描绘成一个同质的、不人道的群体,他们应该受到攻击。本研究通过加深我们对仇外仇恨言论的具体特征的了解,为去人性化的话语研究领域做出了贡献。