Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, and Informatics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Oak Street Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Dec;28(12):1786-1795. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0104. Epub 2022 May 2.
To understand how differences in primary care appointment completion rates between Black and non-Black patients changed in 2020 within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and when telemedicine utilization peaked. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the electronic health record from January 1 to December 31, 2020, among all adults scheduled for a primary care appointment within a large academic medical center. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to estimate adjusted appointment completion rates for Black patients compared with those for non-Black patients in 2020 as compared with those in 2019 within four time periods: (1) prepandemic (January 1, 2020, to March 12, 2020), (2) shutdown (March 13, 2020, to June 3, 2020), (3) reopening (June 4, 2020, to September 30, 2020), and (4) second wave (October 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020). Across 1,947,399 appointments, differences in appointment completion rates between Black and non-Black patients improved in all time periods: +1.4 percentage points prepandemic (95% confidence interval [CI]: +0.8 to +2.0), +11.7 percentage points during shutdown (95% CI: +11.0 to +12.3), +8.2 percentage points during reopening (95% CI: +7.8 to +8.7), and +7.1 percentage points during second wave (95% CI: +6.4 to +7.8) (all -values <0.001). The types of conditions managed by primary care shifted during the shutdown period, but the remainder of 2020 mirrored those from 2019. Racial differences in appointment completion rates narrowed significantly in 2020 even as the mix of disease conditions began to mirror patterns observed in 2019. Telemedicine may be an important tool for improving access to primary care for Black patients. These findings should be key considerations as regulators and payors determine telemedicine's future.
为了了解在 COVID-19 大流行背景下,2020 年黑人和非黑人患者初级保健预约完成率的差异是如何变化的,以及远程医疗利用率何时达到峰值。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,一家大型学术医疗中心所有安排初级保健预约的成年人的电子健康记录。我们使用混合效应逻辑回归来估计与 2019 年相比,2020 年黑人患者与非黑人患者的预约完成率调整值,在四个时间段内进行比较:(1)大流行前(2020 年 1 月 1 日至 3 月 12 日)、(2)停摆期(2020 年 3 月 13 日至 6 月 3 日)、(3)重启期(2020 年 6 月 4 日至 9 月 30 日)和(4)第二波(2020 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)。在 1947399 次预约中,黑人和非黑人患者的预约完成率差异在所有时间段都有所改善:大流行前增加了 1.4 个百分点(95%置信区间[CI]:0.8 至 2.0),停摆期间增加了 11.7 个百分点(95% CI:11.0 至 12.3),重启期间增加了 8.2 个百分点(95% CI:7.8 至 8.7),第二波期间增加了 7.1 个百分点(95% CI:6.4 至 7.8)(所有 p 值均 <0.001)。初级保健管理的疾病类型在停摆期间发生了变化,但 2020 年剩余时间与 2019 年相似。即使疾病状况的组合开始反映 2019 年观察到的模式,2020 年黑人和白人患者的预约完成率差异也明显缩小。远程医疗可能是改善黑人患者获得初级保健服务的重要工具。这些发现应成为监管机构和支付方确定远程医疗未来的关键考虑因素。