Danielle Dunn, Research Coordinator, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Danielle Keenan-Miller, Associate Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Am J Health Behav. 2022 Apr 20;46(2):186-196. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.46.2.8.
In this study, we explored the factors that motivate food choice, and evaluated the psychometric properties and demographic correlates of the Eating Motivation (EATMOT) questionnaire in adults in the United States (US). This cross-sectional survey involved 905 adults in 6 sites across the US. The EATMOT questionnaire measures participants' self-reported motivations for food selection, demographic, and anthropometric data. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, correlations, Welch's t-tests, and logistic regressions. We established a 3-factor model (health-related, emotional, and environmental/political motivations) as the best fit to the data (CFI = .983, RMSEA = .049, SRMR = .054). Gender differences were found within the 3 factors, as well as in the intercorrelations between factors. Higher levels of health-related motivations (B = .10, SE = .04, OR = 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.19), p = .006) were associated with increased reports of weight loss dieting, whereas higher levels of environmental/political motivations (B = -.09, SE = .04, OR = 0.91, p = .02) were associated with fewer reports of weight-loss dieting. An abbreviated version of the EATMOT scale is appropriate for use in a US sample and identifies 3 categories of factors that impact dietary choices. These factors may be important in building interventions to improve diets.
在这项研究中,我们探讨了影响食物选择的因素,并评估了 Eating Motivation(EATMOT)问卷在美国成年人中的心理测量学特性和人口统计学相关性。这项横断面调查涉及美国 6 个地点的 905 名成年人。EATMOT 问卷衡量参与者对食物选择的自我报告动机、人口统计学和人体测量学数据。分析包括探索性和验证性因子分析、相关性、Welch's t 检验和逻辑回归。我们确定了 3 因素模型(与健康相关的、情绪的和环境/政治动机)作为最适合数据的模型(CFI =.983,RMSEA =.049,SRMR =.054)。在 3 个因素内发现了性别差异,以及因素之间的相互关联。更高水平的与健康相关的动机(B =.10,SE =.04,OR = 1.11(95%CI:1.03,1.19),p =.006)与减肥节食的报告增加有关,而更高水平的环境/政治动机(B = -.09,SE =.04,OR = 0.91,p =.02)与减肥节食的报告减少有关。EATMOT 量表的缩写版本适合在美国样本中使用,并确定了影响饮食选择的 3 类因素。这些因素可能对改善饮食的干预措施很重要。