Merikanto Ilona, Pesonen Anu-Katriina, Paunio Tiina, Partonen Timo
SleepWell Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Nat Sci Sleep. 2022 Apr 26;14:829-841. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S356060. eCollection 2022.
Circadian phenotype has a crucial role in determining wellbeing and health prospective. Evening-types have higher risk for sleep and mental health problems, which is also reflected in work wellbeing. However, there are no population-based studies examining the association of working ability and circadian typology at different working-age-groups. Also, the role of predisposing factors, ie, sleep-related differences between circadian types, has not been studied in relation to working ability among circadian types in a population-based sample.
In this population-based sample of 13,114 working-age Finnish adults from 18 to 64 years of age, we examined the associations between circadian type, exhaustion and working ability and the roles of sleep-wake rhythm misalignment and insufficient sleep on these associations in 10-years-wide age-groups. Circadian type was assessed with the widely-used single item for self-assessed morningness/eveningness from the Horne-Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ).
Evening-types, especially definite evening-types, were more exhausted and had poorer working ability than morning-types. Higher exhaustion among evening-types was apparent in all working ages with a peak at ages 45 to 54 years. Poorer working ability in definite evening-types as compared to definite morning-types was found only at ages 35 to 54 years. Evening-types, especially definite-evening-types, had also more social jet lag and they reported more insufficient sleep than definite morning-types. More frequent insufficient sleep associated with poorer working ability and partly mediated the association between circadian type and working ability.
Circadian phenotypes were found to differ in risk for exhaustion and in working ability, and this association was partly mediated by insufficient sleep. Our findings emphasize the importance to improve sleep especially among evening-types to ensure better work wellbeing.
昼夜节律表型在决定幸福感和健康前景方面起着至关重要的作用。夜型人出现睡眠和心理健康问题的风险更高,这在工作幸福感中也有所体现。然而,尚无基于人群的研究探讨不同工作年龄组的工作能力与昼夜节律类型之间的关联。此外,在基于人群的样本中,尚未研究易患因素(即昼夜节律类型之间与睡眠相关的差异)在昼夜节律类型的工作能力方面所起的作用。
在这个基于人群的样本中,有13114名年龄在18至64岁的芬兰工作年龄成年人,我们在10年跨度的年龄组中研究了昼夜节律类型、疲惫感与工作能力之间的关联,以及睡眠-觉醒节律失调和睡眠不足在这些关联中所起的作用。昼夜节律类型通过广泛使用的来自霍恩-奥斯特伯格晨型-夜型问卷(MEQ)的单项自我评估晨型/夜型来评估。
夜型人,尤其是明确的夜型人,比晨型人更容易疲惫,工作能力也更差。夜型人在所有工作年龄段都明显更易疲惫,在45至54岁时达到峰值。与明确的晨型人相比,只有在35至54岁时才发现明确的夜型人工作能力较差。夜型人,尤其是明确的夜型人,也有更多的社会时差,并且他们报告的睡眠不足情况比明确的晨型人更多。更频繁的睡眠不足与较差的工作能力相关,并且部分介导了昼夜节律类型与工作能力之间的关联。
发现昼夜节律表型在疲惫风险和工作能力方面存在差异,并且这种关联部分由睡眠不足介导。我们的研究结果强调了改善睡眠的重要性,尤其是在夜型人中,以确保更好的工作幸福感。