• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

符号数字比较和数字启动不依赖于相同的机制。

Symbolic number comparison and number priming do not rely on the same mechanism.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1969-1977. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02108-x. Epub 2022 May 3.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-022-02108-x
PMID:35503169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9568444/
Abstract

In elementary symbolic number processing, the comparison distance effect (in a comparison task, the task is more difficult with smaller numerical distance between the values) and the priming distance effect (in a number processing task, actual number is easier to process with a numerically close previous number) are two essential phenomena. While a dominant model, the approximate number system model, assumes that the two effects rely on the same mechanism, some other models, such as the discrete semantic system model, assume that the two effects are rooted in different generators. In a correlational study, here we investigate the relation of the two effects. Critically, the reliability of the effects is considered; therefore, a possible null result cannot be attributed to the attenuation of low reliability. The results showed no strong correlation between the two effects, even though appropriate reliabilities were provided. These results confirm the models of elementary number processing that assume distinct mechanisms behind number comparison and number priming.

摘要

在基本符号数字处理中,比较距离效应(在比较任务中,数值之间的距离越小,任务越困难)和启动距离效应(在数字处理任务中,实际数字与接近的前一个数字的数值距离越近,处理起来越容易)是两个基本现象。虽然主导模型——近似数量系统模型——假设这两个效应依赖于相同的机制,但其他一些模型,如离散语义系统模型,则假设这两个效应根植于不同的发生器中。在一项相关研究中,我们在这里研究了这两个效应之间的关系。关键是,考虑到了效应的可靠性;因此,不可能将可能的零结果归因于低可靠性的衰减。结果表明,即使提供了适当的可靠性,这两个效应之间也没有很强的相关性。这些结果证实了基本数字处理模型,这些模型假设数字比较和数字启动背后存在不同的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecdf/9568444/70c3d43444da/13423_2022_2108_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecdf/9568444/4cf6c1d25a5a/13423_2022_2108_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecdf/9568444/dc5830e11cb6/13423_2022_2108_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecdf/9568444/70c3d43444da/13423_2022_2108_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecdf/9568444/4cf6c1d25a5a/13423_2022_2108_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecdf/9568444/dc5830e11cb6/13423_2022_2108_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecdf/9568444/70c3d43444da/13423_2022_2108_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Symbolic number comparison and number priming do not rely on the same mechanism.符号数字比较和数字启动不依赖于相同的机制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1969-1977. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02108-x. Epub 2022 May 3.
2
Numerical distance and size effects dissociate in Indo-Arabic number comparison.在印度-阿拉伯数字比较中,数字距离和大小效应相互分离。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):927-934. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1175-6.
3
The reliability of and the relation between non-symbolic numerical distance effects in comparison, same-different judgments and priming.比较、异同判断和启动中无符号数字距离效应的可靠性及其关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
4
The Indo-Arabic distance effect originates in the response statistics of the task.印欧阿拉伯数字距离效应起源于任务的反应统计。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):468-480. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1052-1. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
5
Stimulus frequency alone can account for the size effect in number comparison.仅刺激频率就能解释数字比较中的大小效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Feb;232:103817. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103817. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
6
The Source of the Symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.符号数字距离效应和大小效应的来源。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01795. eCollection 2016.
7
Cross-notational semantic priming between symbolic and nonsymbolic numerosity.符号与非符号数量之间的跨符号语义启动
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Oct;61(10):1538-52. doi: 10.1080/17470210701595530.
8
Symbolic Numerical Distance Effect Does Not Reflect the Difference between Numbers.符号数字距离效应并不反映数字之间的差异。
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 16;8:2013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02013. eCollection 2017.
9
The semantic control network mediates the relationship between symbolic numerical order processing and arithmetic performance in children.语义控制网络介导了儿童符号数字顺序处理与算术表现之间的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Apr;141:107405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107405. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
A Mechanistic Study of the Association Between Symbolic Approximate Arithmetic Performance and Basic Number Magnitude Processing Based on Task Difficulty.基于任务难度的符号近似算术表现与基本数字大小处理之间关联的机制研究
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 11;9:1551. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01551. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The development of numerical mapping in preschool children.学龄前儿童数字映射能力的发展。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 27;20(6):e0325209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325209. eCollection 2025.
2
The relationship between numerical magnitude processing and math anxiety, and their joint effect on adult math performance, varied by indicators of numerical tasks.数字大小处理与数学焦虑之间的关系,以及它们对成人数学成绩的联合影响,因数字任务的指标而异。
Cogn Process. 2024 Aug;25(3):421-442. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01186-0. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The number sense represents (rational) numbers.数字感代表(有理数)数字。
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 12;44:e178. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000571.
2
A new jsPsych plugin for psychophysics, providing accurate display duration and stimulus onset asynchrony.一款用于心理物理学的全新jsPsych插件,可提供精确的显示持续时间和刺激起始异步性。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):301-310. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01445-w.
3
Ratio effect slope can sometimes be an appropriate metric of the approximate number system sensitivity.比率效应斜率有时可能是近似数字系统敏感性的一个合适指标。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):2165-2176. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01939-6.
4
The Indo-Arabic distance effect originates in the response statistics of the task.印欧阿拉伯数字距离效应起源于任务的反应统计。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):468-480. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1052-1. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
5
Numerical distance effect size is a poor metric of approximate number system acuity.数值距离效应大小是近似数字系统敏锐度的一个不佳指标。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jul;80(5):1057-1063. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1515-x.
6
Symbolic Number Comparison Is Not Processed by the Analog Number System: Different Symbolic and Non-symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.符号数字比较并非由模拟数字系统处理:不同的符号和非符号数字距离及大小效应。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 9;9:124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00124. eCollection 2018.
7
Symbolic Numerical Distance Effect Does Not Reflect the Difference between Numbers.符号数字距离效应并不反映数字之间的差异。
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 16;8:2013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02013. eCollection 2017.
8
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.可靠性悖论:为何稳健的认知任务不能产生可靠的个体差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1.
9
Different Neural Mechanisms for the Comparison and Priming Distance Effects: An fMRI Study.比较与启动距离效应的不同神经机制:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 26;7:1633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01633. eCollection 2016.
10
Numerical distance and size effects dissociate in Indo-Arabic number comparison.在印度-阿拉伯数字比较中,数字距离和大小效应相互分离。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):927-934. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1175-6.