• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在印度-阿拉伯数字比较中,数字距离和大小效应相互分离。

Numerical distance and size effects dissociate in Indo-Arabic number comparison.

作者信息

Krajcsi Attila

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):927-934. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1175-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-016-1175-6
PMID:27753045
Abstract

Numerical distance and size effects (easier number comparisons with large distance or small size) are mostly supposed to reflect a single effect, the ratio effect, which is a consequence of activation of the analog number system (ANS), working according to Weber's law. In an alternative model, symbolic numbers can be processed by a discrete semantic system (DSS), in which the distance and size effects could originate in two independent factors: the distance effect depending on the semantic distance of the units, and the size effect depending on the frequency of the symbols. Whereas in the classic view both symbolic and nonsymbolic numbers are processed by the ANS, in the alternative view only nonsymbolic numbers are processed by the ANS, but symbolic numbers are handled by the DSS. The present work contrasts the two views, investigating whether the sizes of the distance and size effects correlate in nonsymbolic dot comparison and in symbolic Indo-Arabic comparison tasks. If a comparison is backed by the ANS, the distance and size effects should correlate, because the two effects are merely two ways to measure the same ratio effect. However, if a comparison is supported by another system-for example, the DSS-the two effects might dissociate. In the present measurements, the distance and size effects correlated very strongly in the dot comparison task, but they did not correlate in the Indo-Arabic comparison task. Additionally, the effects did not correlate between the Indo-Arabic and dot comparison tasks. These results suggest that symbolic number comparison is not handled by the ANS, but by an alternative representation, such as the DSS.

摘要

数值距离和大小效应(数字距离大或数字大小小时更容易进行数字比较)大多被认为反映了一种单一效应,即比率效应,这是模拟数字系统(ANS)激活的结果,该系统按照韦伯定律运行。在另一种模型中,符号数字可由离散语义系统(DSS)处理,其中距离和大小效应可能源于两个独立因素:距离效应取决于单位的语义距离,大小效应取决于符号的频率。在经典观点中,符号数字和非符号数字均由ANS处理,而在另一种观点中,只有非符号数字由ANS处理,符号数字则由DSS处理。本研究对这两种观点进行了对比,调查在非符号点比较任务和符号印度-阿拉伯数字比较任务中,距离效应和大小效应的大小是否相关。如果比较由ANS支持,那么距离效应和大小效应应该相关,因为这两种效应只是测量同一比率效应的两种方式。然而,如果比较由另一个系统(例如DSS)支持,那么这两种效应可能会分离。在本测量中,距离效应和大小效应在点比较任务中高度相关,但在印度-阿拉伯数字比较任务中不相关。此外,印度-阿拉伯数字比较任务和点比较任务之间的效应也不相关。这些结果表明,符号数字比较不是由ANS处理,而是由一种替代表征(如DSS)处理。

相似文献

1
Numerical distance and size effects dissociate in Indo-Arabic number comparison.在印度-阿拉伯数字比较中,数字距离和大小效应相互分离。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):927-934. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1175-6.
2
Symbolic Number Comparison Is Not Processed by the Analog Number System: Different Symbolic and Non-symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.符号数字比较并非由模拟数字系统处理:不同的符号和非符号数字距离及大小效应。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 9;9:124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00124. eCollection 2018.
3
The Indo-Arabic distance effect originates in the response statistics of the task.印欧阿拉伯数字距离效应起源于任务的反应统计。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):468-480. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1052-1. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
4
The Source of the Symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.符号数字距离效应和大小效应的来源。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01795. eCollection 2016.
5
Two components of the Indo-Arabic numerical size effect.印度-阿拉伯数字大小效应的两个组成部分。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:163-171. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: A review of theory, evidence, and outstanding questions.数字认知中的符号接地问题:理论、证据及未决问题综述
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Mar;70(1):12-23. doi: 10.1037/cep0000070.
7
Ordinality and the nature of symbolic numbers.序数和符号数的性质。
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 23;33(43):17052-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1775-13.2013.
8
Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments.阿拉伯数字、汉字数字和假名数字的语义处理:来自物理和数字大小判断干扰的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Apr;31(3):360-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03194394.
9
Foundations of children's numerical and mathematical skills: the roles of symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of numerical magnitude.儿童数字与数学技能的基础:数字大小的符号与非符号表征的作用。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2015;48:93-116. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
10
The integration between nonsymbolic and symbolic numbers: Evidence from an EEG study.非符号数字与符号数字的整合:一项 EEG 研究的证据。
Brain Behav. 2018 Mar 8;8(4):e00938. doi: 10.1002/brb3.938. eCollection 2018 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychophysics over the counter: The effect of food preference on the perception of food quantity.非处方心理物理学:食物偏好对食物分量感知的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):1060-1080. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03018-5. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
2
Impaired visual attention and numerical processing in children with anisometropic amblyopia and after visual acuity recovery.屈光参差性弱视儿童及视力恢复后的视觉注意力和数字处理能力受损。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82643-w.
3
The relationship between numerical magnitude processing and math anxiety, and their joint effect on adult math performance, varied by indicators of numerical tasks.

本文引用的文献

1
The Source of the Symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.符号数字距离效应和大小效应的来源。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01795. eCollection 2016.
2
The approximate number system is not predictive for symbolic number processing in kindergarteners.近似数字系统无法预测幼儿园儿童的符号数字处理能力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Feb;67(2):271-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.803581. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Subitizing is sensitive to the arrangement of objects.数感对物体的排列很敏感。
数字大小处理与数学焦虑之间的关系,以及它们对成人数学成绩的联合影响,因数字任务的指标而异。
Cogn Process. 2024 Aug;25(3):421-442. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01186-0. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
4
Learning artificial number symbols with ordinal and magnitude information.学习带有顺序和大小信息的人工数字符号。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 7;10(6):220840. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220840. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Symbolic number comparison and number priming do not rely on the same mechanism.符号数字比较和数字启动不依赖于相同的机制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1969-1977. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02108-x. Epub 2022 May 3.
6
Professional mathematicians do not differ from others in the symbolic numerical distance and size effects.专业数学家在符号数值距离和大小效应方面与其他人没有区别。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 13;10(1):11531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68202-z.
7
A comes before B, like 1 comes before 2. Is the parietal cortex sensitive to ordinal relationships in both numbers and letters? An fMRI-adaptation study.A 在 B 之前,就像 1 在 2 之前。顶叶皮层是否对数字和字母的顺序关系都敏感?一项 fMRI 适应研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Apr 15;41(6):1591-1610. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24897. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
On the linear representation of numbers: evidence from a new two-numbers-to-two positions task.论数字的线性表征:来自一项新的双数字对双位置任务的证据。
Psychol Res. 2019 Feb;83(1):48-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1063-y. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
9
The Indo-Arabic distance effect originates in the response statistics of the task.印欧阿拉伯数字距离效应起源于任务的反应统计。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):468-480. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1052-1. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
10
Symbolic Number Comparison Is Not Processed by the Analog Number System: Different Symbolic and Non-symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.符号数字比较并非由模拟数字系统处理:不同的符号和非符号数字距离及大小效应。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 9;9:124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00124. eCollection 2018.
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):227-34. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000191.
4
Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence.非符号数字和累积面积表示对符号数学能力有共同和独特的贡献。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 13;109(46):18737-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207212109. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
5
Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample.毕生数字感:基于大规模互联网样本的揭示
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):11116-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200196109. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
6
A common visual metric for approximate number and density.一种常见的用于近似数量和密度的视觉度量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19552-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113195108. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
7
The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties.非符号数字与其连续视觉属性之间的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):642-8. doi: 10.1037/a0026218. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
8
Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations.用于符号数字表示的神经认知启动工具。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Dec;14(12):542-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
9
Children's representation of symbolic magnitude: the development of the priming distance effect.儿童对符号大小的表征:启动距离效应的发展
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Aug;103(4):480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
10
Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement.非言语数字敏锐度的个体差异与数学成绩相关。
Nature. 2008 Oct 2;455(7213):665-8. doi: 10.1038/nature07246. Epub 2008 Sep 7.