• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床推理过程的基本要素。

The Essential Elements of the Clinical Reasoning Process.

机构信息

Assistant Professor (Dr Joplin-Gonzales), College of Nursing, Texas Woman's University, Dallas; and Professor and Associate Dean for Professional Development, DNP Program Director (Dr Rounds), University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.

出版信息

Nurse Educ. 2022;47(6):E145-E149. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001202. Epub 2022 May 3.

DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001202
PMID:35503469
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical reasoning is an important skill that enables health care professionals to identify and evaluate patients' real or potential problems, implement appropriate interventions, solve clinical problems, and improve the quality of health care and patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to go beyond individual professions and seek consensus across health care professions on the essential elements of the clinical reasoning process.

METHODS

This study used a traditional Delphi methodology to seek consensus from clinical reasoning experts from the fields of nursing, medicine, and physical and occupational health.

RESULTS

The experts reached a consensus on 56 essential elements identified from the clinical reasoning literature. This is the first time health care professions have reached a consensus on the essential elements of the clinical reasoning process using a Delphi study.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving consensus on the essential elements of the clinical reasoning process is essential to better understanding, improved teaching, and evaluation of clinical reasoning skills.

摘要

背景

临床推理是一种重要的技能,使医疗保健专业人员能够识别和评估患者的实际或潜在问题,实施适当的干预措施,解决临床问题,并提高医疗保健质量和患者结果。

目的

本研究的目的是超越单一专业领域,寻求护理、医学和物理与职业健康等医疗保健专业之间对临床推理过程基本要素的共识。

方法

本研究采用传统的德尔菲法,从护理、医学和物理与职业健康领域的临床推理专家那里寻求共识。

结果

专家们就从临床推理文献中确定的 56 个基本要素达成了共识。这是医疗保健专业首次使用德尔菲研究就临床推理过程的基本要素达成共识。

结论

就临床推理过程的基本要素达成共识对于更好地理解、改进教学和评估临床推理技能至关重要。

相似文献

1
The Essential Elements of the Clinical Reasoning Process.临床推理过程的基本要素。
Nurse Educ. 2022;47(6):E145-E149. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001202. Epub 2022 May 3.
2
Mapping clinical reasoning literature across the health professions: a scoping review.跨健康专业映射临床推理文献:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02012-9.
3
A comprehensive approach to identify challenges for clinical reasoning development in undergraduate dental students and their potential solutions.一种全面的方法,用于确定本科生牙科学临床推理发展面临的挑战及其潜在的解决方案。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023 Nov;27(4):859-868. doi: 10.1111/eje.12876. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Kinetic chain revisited: consensus expert opinion on terminology, clinical reasoning, examination, and treatment in people with shoulder pain.重新审视运动链:关于肩痛患者的术语、临床推理、检查和治疗的共识专家意见。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Aug;32(8):e415-e428. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
5
Advancing the assessment of clinical reasoning across the health professions: Definitional and methodologic recommendations.推进卫生专业临床推理评估:定义和方法建议。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Mar;11(2):108-114. doi: 10.1007/s40037-022-00701-3. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
6
Nursing physical assessment for patient safety in general wards: reaching consensus on core skills.综合病房中保障患者安全的护理体格检查:就核心技能达成共识
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1890-900. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13201. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
7
Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education.关于本科医学教育中临床推理课程内容的共识声明。
Med Teach. 2021 Feb;43(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
8
Consensus on an implicit bias and health disparities curriculum in neonatal medicine: a Delphi study.新生儿医学中隐性偏见与健康差异课程的共识:德尔菲研究。
J Perinatol. 2022 Nov;42(11):1519-1526. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01530-2. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
9
Clinical Reasoning Needs to Be Explicitly Addressed in Health Professions Curricula: Recommendations from a European Consortium.医学专业课程应明确纳入临床推理:欧洲联盟的建议
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 25;18(21):11202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111202.
10
Health literacy practices and educational competencies for health professionals: a consensus study.卫生专业人员健康素养实践和教育能力:共识研究。
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):82-102. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.829538.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Alignment Between the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale and Fall Risk Nursing Diagnosis in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective ROC Curve Analysis.评估小儿患者中矮胖子跌倒量表与跌倒风险护理诊断之间的一致性:一项回顾性ROC曲线分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 19;13(14):1748. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141748.