Suppr超能文献

腹腔内充气压力对腹腔镜手术中发生气体泄漏的影响。

Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy.

机构信息

UCD Centre for Precision Surgery, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):7047-7055. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09242-6. Epub 2022 May 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic led to recommendations aimed at minimizing the risk of gas leaks at laparoscopy. As this has continuing relevance including regarding operating room pollution, we empirically quantified carbon dioxide (CO) leak jet velocity (important for particle propulsion) occurring with different instruments inserted into differing trocars repeated across a range of intra-abdominal pressures (IAPs) and modern insufflators in an experimental model.

METHOD

Laparoscopic gas plume leak velocity (metres/second) was computationally enumerated from schlieren optical flow videography on a porcine cadaveric laparoscopic model with IAPs of 4-5, 7-8, 12-15 and 24-25 mmHg (repeated with 5 different insufflators) during simulated operative use of laparoscopic clip appliers, scissors, energy device, camera and staplers as well as Veres needle (positive control) and trocar obturator (negative control) in fresh 5 mm and 12 mm ports.

RESULTS

Close-fitting solid instruments (i.e. cameras and obturators) demonstrated slower gas leak velocities in both the 5 mm and 12 mm ports (p = 0.02 and less than 0.001) when compared to slimmer instruments, however, hollow instrument designs were seen to defy this pattern with the endoscopic linear stapler visibly inducing multiple rapid jests even when compared to similarly sized clip appliers (p = 0.03). However, on a per device basis the operating instrumentation displayed plume speeds which did not vary significantly when challenged with varying post size, IAP and a range of insufflators.

CONCLUSION

In general, surgeon's selection of instrument, port or pressure does not usefully mitigate trocar CO leak velocity. Instead better trocar design is needed, helped by a fuller understanding of trocar valve mechanics via computational fluid dynamics informed by relevant surgical modelling.

摘要

简介

COVID-19 大流行的出现导致了旨在尽量减少腹腔镜手术中气体泄漏风险的建议。由于这一点包括手术室污染在内的持续相关性,我们在实验模型中针对不同的腹腔内压力 (IAP) 和现代注气器,对不同仪器插入不同套管时发生的二氧化碳 (CO) 泄漏射流速度(对颗粒推进很重要)进行了经验量化,这些仪器包括腹腔镜夹闭器、剪刀、能量器械、摄像头和吻合器以及 Veres 针(阳性对照)和套管堵塞器(阴性对照)。

方法

在猪尸体腹腔镜模型上进行计算,使用 schlieren 光学流动视频对腹腔镜气体羽流泄漏速度(米/秒)进行计数,IAP 为 4-5、7-8、12-15 和 24-25mmHg(使用 5 种不同的注气器重复),模拟使用腹腔镜夹闭器、剪刀、能量器械、摄像头和吻合器以及 Veres 针(阳性对照)和套管堵塞器(阴性对照)时。

结果

与较薄的器械相比,紧密贴合的实心器械(即摄像头和堵塞器)在 5mm 和 12mm 端口中显示出较慢的气体泄漏速度(p=0.02 和小于 0.001),然而,空心器械设计似乎违背了这一模式,内镜直线吻合器即使与类似尺寸的夹闭器相比,也明显引起了多个快速喷射(p=0.03)。然而,从单个设备的角度来看,当面临不同的端口尺寸、IAP 和一系列注气器时,手术器械的羽流速度并没有显著变化。

结论

一般来说,外科医生选择器械、端口或压力并不能有效地减轻套管 CO 泄漏速度。相反,需要更好的套管设计,并通过相关手术建模的计算流体动力学提供的更全面的套管阀机制理解来帮助。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验