• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰有智力障碍和无智力障碍的法医患者:人口统计学、犯罪和诊断特征的比较。

Dutch forensic patients with and without intellectual disabilities: A comparison of demographic, offence, and diagnostic characteristics.

机构信息

Forensic Psychiatric Centre de Rooyse Wissel, Venray, The Netherlands; Radboud University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Forensic Psychiatric Centre de Rooyse Wissel, Venray, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jul;126:104255. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104255. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104255
PMID:35504124
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with an intellectual disability (ID) and offending histories constitute a challenging clinical group. The present study examined commonalities and differences in demographic, diagnostic and offence characteristics in patients with and without intellectual disabilities who were either convicted for violent or sexual offences and who resided in mandated care in the Netherlands.

METHOD

We compared 165 offenders with an ID to 249 offenders without an ID. We compared both groups by type of offence (i.e., sexual versus violent offence) using Mann-Whitney U-test or independent samples t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables.

RESULTS

In general, forensic patients with an ID were younger at admission (U=357, z = -12.668, p < .001), had more prior convictions for violent offences (χ(1)= 6.175, p = .013) and more prevalent diagnoses of substance abuse disorders (χ(1)= 9.266, p = .002) than those without an ID. Similar results were found for patients with IDs with sexual offence histories.

CONCLUSION

A clear understanding of distinct characteristics of forensic patients with intellectual disabilities is crucial in understanding (sexual) violent behavior in this population as it mayassistclinicians in prioritizing interventionstrategies.

摘要

背景

有犯罪史的智力障碍(ID)患者是一个具有挑战性的临床群体。本研究考察了在荷兰受强制监护的、有或无智力障碍的、被判犯有暴力或性犯罪的患者在人口统计学、诊断和犯罪特征方面的共同点和差异。

方法

我们将 165 名有智力障碍的罪犯与 249 名无智力障碍的罪犯进行了比较。我们使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验或独立样本 t 检验比较了两组的犯罪类型(即性犯罪与暴力犯罪),对于连续变量使用均数,对于分类变量使用卡方检验。

结果

一般来说,入院时有智力障碍的法医患者年龄较小(U=357,z=-12.668,p<0.001),有更多的暴力犯罪前科(χ(1)=6.175,p=0.013),更普遍存在药物滥用障碍的诊断(χ(1)=9.266,p=0.002)。有性犯罪史的有智力障碍的患者也有类似的结果。

结论

清楚了解有智力障碍的法医患者的独特特征对于理解该人群的(性)暴力行为至关重要,因为这可能有助于临床医生确定干预策略的优先级。

相似文献

1
Dutch forensic patients with and without intellectual disabilities: A comparison of demographic, offence, and diagnostic characteristics.荷兰有智力障碍和无智力障碍的法医患者:人口统计学、犯罪和诊断特征的比较。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jul;126:104255. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104255. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
2
The burden for clinical services of persons with an intellectual disability or mental disorder convicted of criminal offences: A birth cohort study of 14,605 persons followed to age 64.具有智力残疾或精神障碍的犯罪者的临床服务负担:对 14605 人的队列研究,随访至 64 岁。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;78(5):411-420. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2337192. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
3
The relationship between maltreatment victimisation and sexual and violent offending: differences between adolescent offenders with and without intellectual disability.虐待受害经历与性犯罪及暴力犯罪之间的关系:有智力残疾和无智力残疾的青少年罪犯之间的差异。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Nov;58(11):979-91. doi: 10.1111/jir.12031. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
4
Sexual Offenders With Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Comparison Study in an Incarcerated U.S. Sample.性罪犯与智力障碍者:美国被监禁样本的探索性比较研究。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Aug;68(10-11):1052-1073. doi: 10.1177/0306624X211066825. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
An evaluation and 20-year follow-up of a community forensic intellectual disability service.一项社区法医智力残疾服务的评估及20年随访。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2013 Apr;23(2):138-49. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1859.
6
Outcome of serious violent offenders with psychotic illness and cognitive disorder dealt with by the New South Wales criminal justice system.新南威尔士州刑事司法系统处理的有精神病和认知障碍的严重暴力罪犯的结果。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 May;53(5):441-446. doi: 10.1177/0004867418771751. Epub 2018 May 13.
7
Psychiatric and Forensic Differences Between Men Charged with Sex Offences and Men Charged with Other Offences.精神科和法医鉴定:性犯罪者与其他犯罪者的区别
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Nov;65(6):2042-2049. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14511. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Emotional States Related to Sexual Offending Versus Violent Offending Using a Schema Therapy Perspective.从心理图式治疗角度看与性犯罪相关的情绪状态与暴力犯罪。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Sep;68(12):1179-1196. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221110799. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
9
Examining the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending.检查与性犯罪一致的态度问卷。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jul;33(4):720-728. doi: 10.1111/jar.12663. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
10
Staff attributions towards men with intellectual disability who have a history of sexual offending and challenging behaviour.工作人员对有性犯罪和挑衅行为历史的智障男性的归因。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Sep;53(9):807-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01194.x. Epub 2009 Jul 21.