Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2022 Sep;58:102075. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2022.102075. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Differentiation between the various manner of stab cases is challenging in forensic medicine. Although the distinction between homicidal and suicidal stabbing is well defined, there is a lack of discrimination between accidental and homicidal cases. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the characteristics of and outcomes for stab patients admitted to multiple emergency hospitals to highlight the distinction between accidental and homicidal stab wounds. This prospective cohort study assessed all patients with stab wounds admitted to multiple emergency hospitals from February 2021 to October 2021. Data collected on admission were demographics, trauma circumstances, internal organ damage, and patients' outcomes. Afterward, patients were categorized into homicidal or accidental stabs. Most of the included 51 stab cases were homicidal (78.4%). Most homicidal stabs were in middle-aged male drivers; were caused by sharp weapons, such as a penknife; and occurred in fights outdoors during the summer daytime. In contrast, most accidental stabs were occupational among building carpenters. Although homicidal stab wounds were significantly associated with a regular elliptical shape, oblique orientation, and defense wounds, the existence of a regular elliptical wound shape increased the likelihood of a homicidal stab. Additionally, penetrating stab type and a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) were the dominant predictors of complications and mortality in stab patients, respectively. For fatal vague stab cases scenarios, the presence of an elliptical wound suggests the probability of homicidal injury than accidental. The initial ISS and stab wound type should be assessed to stratify stab patients who need intensive management in emergency hospitals.
在法医学中,区分各种刺伤方式具有挑战性。虽然凶杀和自杀刺伤之间的区别是明确的,但在意外和凶杀案件之间缺乏区分。因此,本研究旨在评估多家急诊医院收治的刺伤患者的特征和结局,以突出意外和凶杀刺伤之间的区别。这项前瞻性队列研究评估了 2021 年 2 月至 2021 年 10 月期间多家急诊医院收治的所有刺伤患者。入院时收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、创伤情况、内脏器官损伤和患者结局。随后,将患者分为凶杀或意外刺伤。纳入的 51 例刺伤病例中,大多数(78.4%)为凶杀。大多数凶杀刺伤发生在中年男性司机身上;由尖锐武器引起,如钢笔刀;并且在夏季白天户外的打斗中发生。相比之下,大多数意外刺伤发生在建筑木匠的职业中。尽管凶杀刺伤与规则椭圆形、斜向和防御性伤口显著相关,但规则椭圆形伤口的存在增加了凶杀刺伤的可能性。此外,穿透性刺伤类型和较高的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)分别是刺伤患者并发症和死亡率的主要预测因素。对于致命的模糊刺伤情况,椭圆形伤口的存在表明凶杀性损伤的可能性大于意外。应评估初始 ISS 和刺伤类型,以对需要在急诊医院进行强化管理的刺伤患者进行分层。