Khan K S, Bueno-Cavanillas A, Zamora J
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP-Spain).
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP-Spain).
Semergen. 2022 Sep;48(6):431-436. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2021.12.006. Epub 2022 May 3.
This article focuses on the second step of a systematic review, i.e. how to identify relevant studies for the planned review. The search, using terms related to the questions framed in the previous step, should be comprehensive. However, it is important to establish selection criteria to include relevant studies and to exclude those that might present a risk of bias at this stage. Details such as broadening the spectrum of electronic databases consulted, avoiding restricting searches to a single language, managing references correctly, and recording decisions made throughout the process are winning factors for successful study identification.
本文聚焦于系统评价的第二步,即如何为计划中的评价识别相关研究。使用与上一步所提出问题相关的术语进行检索应全面。然而,在此阶段制定选择标准以纳入相关研究并排除可能存在偏倚风险的研究很重要。诸如拓宽所查阅电子数据库的范围、避免将检索局限于单一语言、正确管理参考文献以及记录整个过程中所做的决定等细节,是成功识别研究的制胜因素。