Suppr超能文献

一项多机构前瞻性观察性研究,旨在评估髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)对预防髋部骨折成年患者谵妄的作用。

A multi-institutional prospective observational study to evaluate fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for preventing delirium in adults with hip fracture.

作者信息

Salottolo Kristin, Meinig Richard, Fine Landon, Kelly Michael, Madayag Robert, Ekengren Francie, Tanner Allen, Roman Phillip, Bar-Or David

机构信息

Trauma Research Department, St Anthony Hospital & Medical Campus, Lakewood, Colorado, USA.

Orthopedic Services Department, Penrose-St Francis Health Services, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Apr 14;7(1):e000904. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-000904. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Until recently, systemic opioids have been standard care for acute pain management of geriatric hip fracture; however, opioids increase risk for delirium. Fascia Iliaca compartment blocks (FICB) may be favored to systemic analgesia for reducing delirium, but this has not been well demonstrated. We evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive FICB versus systemic analgesia on delirium incidence, opioid consumption, and pain scores.

METHODS

This prospective, observational cohort study was performed in patients (55-90 years) with traumatic hip fracture admitted to five trauma centers within 12 hours of injury, enrolled between January 2019 and November 2020. The primary end point was development of delirium, defined by the Confusion Assessment Method tool, from arrival through 48 hours postoperatively, and analyzed with multivariate Firth logistic regression. Secondary end points were analyzed with analysis of covariance models and included preoperative and postoperative oral morphine equivalents and pain numeric rating scale scores.

RESULTS

There were 517 patients enrolled, 381 (74%) received FICB and 136 (26%) did not. Delirium incidence was 5.4% (n=28) and was similar for patients receiving FICB versus no FICB (FICB, 5.8% and no FICB, 4.4%; adjusted OR: 1.2 (95% CI 0.5 to 3.0), p=0.65). Opioid requirements were similar for patients receiving FICB and no FICB, preoperatively (p=0.75) and postoperatively (p=0.51). Pain scores were significantly lower with FICB than no FICB, preoperatively (4.2 vs 5.1, p=0.002) and postoperatively (2.9 vs 3.5, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

FICB demonstrated significant benefit on self-reported pain but without a concomitant reduction in opioid consumption. Regarding delirium incidence, these findings suggest clinical equipoise and the need for a randomized trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-prospective, therapeutic.

摘要

目的

直到最近,全身使用阿片类药物一直是老年髋部骨折急性疼痛管理的标准治疗方法;然而,阿片类药物会增加谵妄风险。髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)可能比全身镇痛更有利于减少谵妄,但这一点尚未得到充分证实。我们评估了辅助性FICB与全身镇痛在谵妄发生率、阿片类药物消耗量和疼痛评分方面的疗效。

方法

这项前瞻性观察队列研究在2019年1月至2020年11月期间,对受伤后12小时内入住五个创伤中心的55至90岁创伤性髋部骨折患者进行。主要终点是使用混乱评估方法工具定义的谵妄发生情况,从入院到术后48小时,并采用多变量Firth逻辑回归分析。次要终点采用协方差分析模型进行分析,包括术前和术后口服吗啡当量以及疼痛数字评定量表评分。

结果

共纳入517例患者,381例(74%)接受了FICB,136例(26%)未接受。谵妄发生率为5.4%(n = 28),接受FICB和未接受FICB的患者相似(FICB组为5.8%,未接受FICB组为4.4%;调整后的比值比:1.2(95%CI 0.5至3.0),p = 0.65)。接受FICB和未接受FICB的患者术前(p = 0.75)和术后(p = 0.51)阿片类药物需求量相似。FICB组的疼痛评分在术前(4.2对5.1,p = 0.002)和术后(2.9对3.5,p = 0.04)均显著低于未接受FICB组。

结论

FICB在自我报告的疼痛方面显示出显著益处,但并未同时减少阿片类药物的消耗量。关于谵妄发生率,这些发现表明临床 equipoise 以及需要进行随机试验。

证据级别

II - 前瞻性,治疗性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/9014076/e869309b3d3b/tsaco-2022-000904f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验