Suppr超能文献

新冠肺炎患者早期与晚期气管切开术的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clinical Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, 242949Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Sep;37(9):1121-1132. doi: 10.1177/08850666221098930. Epub 2022 May 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Tracheostomy is increasingly performed when a prolonged course of IMV is anticipated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine clinical and resource utilization benefits of early versus late tracheostomy among COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase were used to identify relevant studies comparing outcomes of COVID-19 patients undergoing early and late tracheostomy from January 1, 2020, to December 1, 2021.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were selected, and 2222 critically ill COVID-19 patients hospitalized between January to December 2020 were included. Among the included patients, 34.5% and 65.5% underwent early and late tracheostomy, respectively. Among the included studies, 58.3% and 41.7% defined early tracheostomy using cutoffs of 14 and 10 days, respectively. All-cause in-hospital mortality was not different between the early and late tracheostomy groups (32.9% vs. 33.1%; OR = 1.00; P = 0.98). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated a similar mortality rate in studies using a cutoff of 10 days (34.6% vs. 35.5%; OR = 0.97; P = 0.89) or 14 days (31.2% vs. 27.7%; OR = 1.05; P = 0.78). The early tracheostomy group had shorter ICU length of stay (LOS) (mean: 23.18 vs. 30.51 days; P < 0.001) and IMV duration (mean: 20.49 vs. 28.94 days; P < 0.001) than the late tracheostomy group. The time from tracheostomy to decannulation was longer (mean: 23.36 vs. 16.24 days; P = 0.02) in the early tracheostomy group than in the late tracheostomy group, but the time from tracheostomy to IMV weaning was similar in both groups. Other clinical characteristics, including age, were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early tracheostomy reduced the ICU LOS and IMV duration among COVID-19 patients compared with late tracheostomy, but the mortality rate was similar in both groups. The findings have important implications for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, especially in a resource-limited setting.

摘要

背景

相当比例的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者需要入住重症监护病房(ICU)并接受有创机械通气(IMV)。当预计需要长时间进行 IMV 时,通常会进行气管切开术。

目的

确定 COVID-19 患者早期与晚期气管切开术的临床和资源利用获益。

方法

使用 Pubmed、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus 和 Embase 来确定从 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 1 日比较 COVID-19 患者接受早期和晚期气管切开术结果的相关研究。

结果

选择了 12 项研究,纳入了 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间住院的 2222 例危重症 COVID-19 患者。在纳入的患者中,分别有 34.5%和 65.5%接受了早期和晚期气管切开术。在纳入的研究中,58.3%和 41.7%分别使用 14 天和 10 天的截止值来定义早期气管切开术。早期与晚期气管切开术组的全因院内死亡率无差异(32.9% vs. 33.1%;OR=1.00;P=0.98)。敏感性分析显示,在使用 10 天截止值(34.6% vs. 35.5%;OR=0.97;P=0.89)或 14 天截止值(31.2% vs. 27.7%;OR=1.05;P=0.78)的研究中,死亡率也相似。与晚期气管切开术组相比,早期气管切开术组 ICU 住院时间(均值:23.18 天 vs. 30.51 天;P<0.001)和 IMV 持续时间(均值:20.49 天 vs. 28.94 天;P<0.001)更短。早期气管切开术组从气管切开术到拔管的时间(均值:23.36 天 vs. 16.24 天;P=0.02)长于晚期气管切开术组,但两组从气管切开术到 IMV 脱机的时间相似。两组的其他临床特征,包括年龄,均相似。

结论

与晚期气管切开术相比,COVID-19 患者的早期气管切开术降低了 ICU 住院时间和 IMV 持续时间,但两组的死亡率相似。这些发现对 COVID-19 患者的治疗具有重要意义,特别是在资源有限的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验