Suppr超能文献

[促进麻醉学领域青年学者发展:吸引实习的因素]

[Promoting young academics in anesthesiology: factors for an attractive internship].

作者信息

Scheffel D, Wirkner J, Adler S, Wassilew G, Dragowsky K, Seemann R, Fröhlich S, Kasch R

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Str., 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland.

Institut für Psychologie, Lehrstuhl für Physiologische und Klinische Psychologie/Psychotherapie, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2022 May;71(5):362-372. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-00936-5. Epub 2022 May 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Practical experiences in clinical traineeships can shape the later specialty choice of medical students.

KEY QUESTION

The following study aimed to find factors in anesthesiological clinical traineeship that encourage students to specialize in the field.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

As part of a nationwide online survey conducted by the working group for education of the German Association for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, DGOU), study participants (n = 479) answered questions about their minimum 4‑week traineeship in anesthesiology. The information on items was analyzed in six content categories: 1) integration into the team, 2) acquisition of skills, 3) teachers, 4) quality of teaching, 5) structure of teaching and 6) satisfaction with the clinical internship. The respondents were subdivided into 4 groups by answering the question "Could you imagine an elective in anesthesiology during the final year (PJ)" with "Yes, I have made this decision after the clinical traineeship" (JdF, n = 212, 44%), "No I have decided against an elective during the final year after the traineeship" (NdF, n = 56, 12%), "Yes I have decided for an elective in anesthesiology before the internship" (JvF Yes: n = 144, 30%) and "No, I have decided against an elective in anesthesiology before the internship" (NvF: n = 67, 14%). Answers of the participants regarding the six content categories were compared between the four groups.

RESULTS

The survey reached all medical faculties in Germany and included participants with an average age of 25.8 years and a balanced gender ratio. There were significant differences between satisfied and dissatisfied students in all four subgroups. Of the 479 respondents, 211 (44%) were already set regarding their decision of choosing anesthesiology as an elective during the final year before the clinical traineeship. Of the respondents 268 (56%) were influenced by the internship, 212 (44%) of them positively. In total, 81% of the trainees rated the internship as "satisfying". Students who were satisfied with the overall internship and who spoke in favor of the PJ elective in anesthesiology differed significantly from the other groups in the categories of team integration, skills acquisition, structure and quality of teaching. The teaching of practical skills and specialist knowledge as well as the integration into diagnostics and treatment planning promoted the recruitment of young people.

DISCUSSION

The positively evaluated anesthesiology internship promotes later specialty choice, with quality and structure of the teaching affecting student satisfaction. Trainees who were attracted by anesthesiology gave better overall ratings and acquired more skills during the course of the internship. In order to win aspiring doctors for anesthesiology, the medical team has to integrate trainees well and support the acquisition of practical skills and specialist knowledge. In addition, didactics and practical relevance should be given high priority.

摘要

背景

临床实习的实践经验会影响医学生日后的专业选择。

关键问题

以下研究旨在找出麻醉学临床实习中促使学生选择该领域作为专业的因素。

材料与方法

作为德国骨科与创伤外科学会(Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, DGOU)教育工作组开展的一项全国性在线调查的一部分,研究参与者(n = 479)回答了有关其至少为期4周的麻醉学实习的问题。对各项内容的信息按照六个内容类别进行分析:1)融入团队,2)技能获取,3)带教老师,4)教学质量,5)教学结构,6)对临床实习的满意度。通过回答“你能否想象在最后一年选择麻醉学作为选修课(PJ)”这一问题,将受访者分为4组:“能,我在临床实习后做出了这个决定”(JdF,n = 2,12,44%),“不能,实习后我决定不在最后一年选择选修课”(NdF,n = 56,12%),“能,我在实习前就决定选择麻醉学作为选修课”(JvF是:n = 144,30%),以及“不能,实习前我就决定不选择麻醉学作为选修课”(NvF:n = 67,14%)。比较了四组参与者在六个内容类别上的回答。

结果

该调查涵盖了德国所有医学院系,参与者的平均年龄为25.8岁,性别比例均衡。在所有四个亚组中,满意和不满意的学生之间存在显著差异。在479名受访者中,211名(44%)在临床实习前的最后一年就已经确定了选择麻醉学作为选修课的决定。在受访者中,268名(56%)受到实习的影响,其中212名(44%)受到积极影响。总体而言,81%的实习生将实习评为“满意”。对整体实习满意且支持在最后一年选择麻醉学作为选修课的学生在团队融入、技能获取、教学结构和教学质量等类别上与其他组有显著差异。实践技能和专业知识的教学以及融入诊断和治疗计划促进了年轻人的加入。

讨论

得到积极评价的麻醉学实习促进了日后的专业选择,教学质量和结构影响学生满意度。被麻醉学吸引的实习生给出了更好的总体评价,并且在实习过程中获得了更多技能。为了吸引有抱负的医生投身麻醉学,医疗团队必须让实习生很好地融入,并支持其实践技能和专业知识的获取。此外,教学方法和实际相关性应被高度重视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/9068631/46fafc67cb88/101_2021_936_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验