Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Medically Assisted Procreation Center, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;78(7):1185-1196. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03330-1. Epub 2022 May 4.
Infertility is a topic of growing interest, and female infertility is often treated with gonadotropins. Evidence regarding comparative safety and efficacy of different gonadotropin formulations is available from clinical studies, while real-world data are missing. The present study aims to investigate effectiveness and safety of treatment with different gonadotropin formulations in women undergoing medically assisted procreation treatments in Latium, a region in central Italy, through a real-world data approach.
A retrospective population-based cohort study in women between the ages of 18 and 45 years who were prescribed with at least one gonadotropin between 2007 and 2019 was conducted. Women were enrolled from the regional drug dispense registry, and data on their clinical history, exposure to therapeutic cycles (based on recombinant "REC" or extractives "EXT" gonadotropin, or combined protocol "CMD" (REC + EXT)), and maternal/infantile outcomes were linked from the regional healthcare administrative databases. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to estimate the association between exposure and outcomes.
Overall, 90,292 therapeutic cycles prescribed to 35,899 women were linked to pregnancies. Overall, 15.8% of cycles successfully led to pregnancy. Compared to extractives, recombinant and combined treatments showed a stronger association with conception rate (RR adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12; RR adj = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.11-1.24). Maternal outcomes occurred in less than 5% of deliveries, and no significant differences between treatments were observed (REC vs EXT, pre-eclampsia: RR adj = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.86-1.79, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: RR adj = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.59-2.65, gestational diabetes: RR adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.84-1.35). Regarding infantile outcomes, similar results were obtained for different gonadotropin formulations (REC vs EXT: low birth weight: RR adj = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.83-1.26, multiple births: RR adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.92-1.23, preterm birth: RR adj = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.26).
Efficacy and safety profiles of REC proved to be similar to those of EXT. Regarding the efficacy in terms of conception rate and birth rate, protocols using the combined approach performed slightly better. Outcomes related to maternal and infantile safety were generally very rare, and safety features were overlapping between gonadotropin formulations.
不孕症是一个日益受到关注的话题,女性不孕症通常采用促性腺激素治疗。临床研究提供了关于不同促性腺激素制剂比较安全性和疗效的证据,而现实世界的数据则缺乏。本研究旨在通过真实世界的数据方法,调查在意大利中部拉齐奥地区接受医学辅助生育治疗的女性中,使用不同促性腺激素制剂的治疗效果和安全性。
这是一项回顾性基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 2007 年至 2019 年期间至少接受过一次促性腺激素治疗的 18 至 45 岁女性。女性从区域药物配给登记处招募,并从区域医疗保健行政数据库中获取其临床病史、治疗周期暴露情况(基于重组“REC”或提取物“EXT”促性腺激素或联合方案“CMD”(REC+EXT))和母婴/婴儿结局的数据。应用多变量逻辑回归模型估计暴露与结局之间的关联。
共链接了 90292 个治疗周期,涉及 35899 名女性,这些周期与妊娠相关。总体而言,15.8%的周期成功导致妊娠。与提取物相比,重组和联合治疗与受孕率的关联更强(调整后的 RR 比值比=1.06,95%置信区间:1.01-1.12;调整后的 RR 比值比=1.17,95%置信区间:1.11-1.24)。母婴结局不到 5%的分娩中发生,且不同治疗组之间未观察到显著差异(REC 与 EXT 相比:先兆子痫:调整后的 RR 比值比=1.24,95%置信区间:0.86-1.79,卵巢过度刺激综合征:调整后的 RR 比值比=1.25,95%置信区间:0.59-2.65,妊娠期糖尿病:调整后的 RR 比值比=1.06,95%置信区间:0.84-1.35)。关于婴儿结局,不同促性腺激素制剂的结果相似(REC 与 EXT 相比:低出生体重:调整后的 RR 比值比=0.98,95%置信区间:0.83-1.26,多胎妊娠:调整后的 RR 比值比=1.06,95%置信区间:0.92-1.23,早产:调整后的 RR 比值比=1.03,95%置信区间:0.92-1.26)。
REC 的疗效和安全性与 EXT 相似。在受孕率和出生率方面的疗效方面,使用联合方案的方案表现稍好。与母婴安全性相关的结局通常非常罕见,且不同促性腺激素制剂的安全性特征重叠。