• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用Plusoptix自动验光仪A09检测弱视的屈光危险因素]

[Detections of refractive risk factors for amblyopia with Plusoptix Autorefractor A09].

作者信息

Al-Romhein Philip, Fröhlich Monika, Schmickler Stefanie, Salchow Daniel J

机构信息

Augen-Zentrum-Nordwest MVZ, Ahaus, Deutschland.

Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Sektion Kinderaugenheilkunde | Strabologie/Orthoptik | Neuroophthalmologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Ophthalmologie. 2022 Oct;119(10):1035-1040. doi: 10.1007/s00347-022-01645-z. Epub 2022 May 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00347-022-01645-z
PMID:35507085
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Amblyopia is the most frequent cause for decreased vision in childhood. Important risk factors for amblyopia (ARF) are refractive errors. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the Plusoptix Autorefractor A09 (POA09) to detect refractive ARF.

METHOD

This prospective non-blinded, one-armed study was conducted between February 2012 and September 2015. Children aged 6 months to 12 years were screened in kindergarten and schools for refractive errors. Thresholds for screening failure were hyperopia ≥ 3.5 diopters (D), myopia ≥ 3.0 D, anisometropia ≥ 1.5 D and astigmatism ≥ 1.5 D (axis 90° or 180° ± 10°) or ≥ 1.0 D (≥ 10° axis deviation of 90° or 180°). Children who failed screening were advised to see an ophthalmologist for a comprehensive eye examination. After the visit, parents were asked for the results of the examination. A reference group of children who did not fail screening also received a comprehensive eye examination. Based on the number of children who failed screening, we calculated the proportion of correctly detected refractive errors. Based on the children of the reference group we calculated the proportion of correctly excluded refractive errors and the false negative rate.

RESULTS

In this study 3170 children were screened, 715 children (22.3%) failed screening. For 460 of these (64.3%) follow-up was available and for 132 children information on refractive errors in cycloplegia was available. Most frequent refractive errors at screening were astigmatism (90.9%) and anisometropia (11.4%). Most frequent refractive errors in cycloplegia were astigmatism (56.8%) and hyperopia (18.9%). The proportion of correctly detected refractive errors in the screening was highest for astigmatism (60%) and anisometropia (53.3%), followed by hyperopia (33.3%) and myopia (25%).

CONCLUSION

The reliability of POA09 to detect refractive ARF in children without cycloplegia was limited, highlighting the importance of a systematic amblyopia screening. A screening in cycloplegia can increase the proportion of correctly detected refractive ARF and should be studied.

摘要

背景

弱视是儿童视力下降的最常见原因。弱视的重要危险因素(ARF)是屈光不正。本研究的目的是检验Plusoptix自动验光仪A09(POA09)检测屈光性ARF的可靠性。

方法

这项前瞻性非盲单臂研究于2012年2月至2015年9月进行。在幼儿园和学校对6个月至12岁的儿童进行屈光不正筛查。筛查失败的阈值为远视≥3.5屈光度(D)、近视≥3.0 D、屈光参差≥1.5 D以及散光≥1.5 D(轴位90°或180°±10°)或≥1.0 D(90°或180°轴位偏差≥10°)。筛查失败的儿童被建议去看眼科医生进行全面的眼部检查。就诊后,询问家长检查结果。未筛查失败的儿童参考组也接受了全面的眼部检查。根据筛查失败的儿童数量,我们计算出正确检测出的屈光不正比例。根据参考组的儿童,我们计算出正确排除屈光不正的比例和假阴性率。

结果

本研究共筛查了3170名儿童,715名儿童(22.3%)筛查失败。其中460名(64.3%)有随访结果,132名儿童有睫状肌麻痹下屈光不正的信息。筛查时最常见的屈光不正为散光(90.9%)和屈光参差(11.4%)。睫状肌麻痹下最常见的屈光不正为散光(56.8%)和远视(18.9%)。筛查中正确检测出的屈光不正比例以散光(60%)和屈光参差(53.3%)最高,其次是远视(33.3%)和近视(25%)。

结论

POA09在未使用睫状肌麻痹剂的情况下检测儿童屈光性ARF的可靠性有限,突出了系统性弱视筛查的重要性。使用睫状肌麻痹剂进行筛查可提高正确检测出的屈光性ARF的比例,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
[Detections of refractive risk factors for amblyopia with Plusoptix Autorefractor A09].[使用Plusoptix自动验光仪A09检测弱视的屈光危险因素]
Ophthalmologie. 2022 Oct;119(10):1035-1040. doi: 10.1007/s00347-022-01645-z. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Instrument referral criteria for PlusoptiX and SureSight based on 2021 AAPOS guidelines: A population-based study.基于 2021 年 AAPOS 指南的 PlusoptiX 和 SureSight 仪器转诊标准:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;10:959757. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.959757. eCollection 2022.
3
Refractive Errors and Amblyopia Among Children Screened by the UCLA Preschool Vision Program in Los Angeles County.洛杉矶县加州大学洛杉矶分校学龄前儿童视力计划筛查的儿童屈光不正和弱视。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;210:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
4
Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy.儿童屈光不正筛查:由非专业筛查人员使用plusoptiX S08和Retinomax K-plus2与睫状肌麻痹验光法进行比较。
J AAPOS. 2010 Dec;14(6):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.09.015.
5
[Use of Plusoptix as a screening method for refractive ambliopia].[使用Plusoptix作为屈光性弱视的筛查方法]
Oftalmologia. 2012;56(2):49-55.
6
Detection of significant vision conditions in children using QuickSee wavefront autorefractor.使用 QuickSee 波前自动验光仪检测儿童的重要视力状况。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 May;44(3):501-513. doi: 10.1111/opo.13301. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
7
Accuracy of PlusOptix A09 distance refraction in pediatric myopia and hyperopia.PlusOptix A09 验光仪在儿童近视和远视中的准确性
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;16:72. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0247-8.
8
Refractive Errors and Amblyopia in the UCLA Preschool Vision Program; First Year Results.加州大学洛杉矶分校学前视力项目中的屈光不正与弱视;第一年结果
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;172:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
9
Comparison of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegia retinoscopy in detecting refractive error.新的独立暗室折射筛查仪与台式自动折射仪和睫状肌麻痹检影验光在检测屈光不正方面的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 27;23(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03231-6.
10
Non-cycloplegic screening for refractive errors in children with the hand-held autorefractor Retinomax: final results and comparison with non-cycloplegic photoscreening.使用手持自动验光仪Retinomax对儿童进行非散瞳屈光不正筛查:最终结果及与非散瞳照片筛查的比较
Strabismus. 2001 Jun;9(2):59-70. doi: 10.1076/stra.9.2.59.701.