Cowey Lance, Chen Chieh-I, Aguilar Kathleen M, Davies Kalatu, LaFontaine Patrick R, Fury Matthew G, Bowler Timothy, Golozar Asieh, Jalbert Jessica J
Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 May;12(5):1211-1224. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00724-y. Epub 2022 May 4.
Until recently, patients discontinuing first-line (1L) hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) had few subsequent treatment options. The objective of this study was to describe the treatment journey and prognosis of patients discontinuing 1L HHI for BCC.
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with BCC who discontinued 1L HHI treatment in The US Oncology Network between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2019 (with follow-up until 1 May 2020). Two cohorts were identified: patients who initiated a second-line (2L) treatment (2L initiators), and patients with 1L progression or toxicity without pathology-confirmed complete response who did not initiate 2L treatment (2L non-initiators). Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, and outcomes are reported for each cohort.
Among 115 patients with BCC who received 1L HHI treatment, 63.5% (n = 73/115) discontinued 1L HHIs. Of those, 50.7% (n = 37/73) discontinued because of documented toxicity or progression, without evidence of a complete response. We identified 4 patients who initiated 2L systemic treatment (median age 68.7 years, 100.0% female) and 15 patients who were eligible for the 2L non-initiator cohort (median age 80.2 years, 20.0% female). Median 1L HHI duration was 6.8 months (range 1.9-20.6 months) for the 2L non-initiator cohort and 8.6 months (range 6.8-42.2 months) for 2L initiators. At the end of follow-up, among 2L non-initiators (median follow-up duration 9.7 months), 40.0% were lost to follow-up, 33.3% had died, 20.0% continued observation, and 6.7% transitioned to an academic medical center or hospital; among 2L initiators (median follow-up duration 6.3 months), 50.0% were lost to follow-up, 25.0% had died, and 25.0% continued observation.
Following 1L HHI discontinuation, lack of standardized care and suboptimal outcomes were observed, including limited receipt of 2L treatment. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of newer BCC treatment options.
直到最近,因基底细胞癌(BCC)停用一线(1L)刺猬信号通路抑制剂(HHIs)的患者后续治疗选择仍很少。本研究的目的是描述因BCC停用1L HHI的患者的治疗过程和预后。
这是一项对2012年1月1日至2019年1月1日期间在美国肿瘤学网络中停用1L HHI治疗的BCC患者进行的回顾性队列研究(随访至2020年5月1日)。确定了两个队列:开始二线(2L)治疗的患者(2L启动者),以及1L病情进展或出现毒性且未经病理证实完全缓解且未开始2L治疗的患者(2L未启动者)。报告了每个队列的患者人口统计学、治疗特征和结局。
在115例接受1L HHI治疗的BCC患者中,63.5%(n = 73/115)停用了1L HHIs。其中,50.7%(n = 37/73)因记录在案的毒性或病情进展而停用,且无完全缓解的证据。我们确定了4例开始2L全身治疗的患者(中位年龄68.7岁,100.0%为女性)和15例符合2L未启动者队列标准的患者(中位年龄80.2岁,20.0%为女性)。2L未启动者队列的1L HHI中位持续时间为6.8个月(范围1.9 - 20.6个月),2L启动者为8.6个月(范围6.8 - 42.2个月)。随访结束时,在2L未启动者中(中位随访持续时间9.7个月),40.0%失访,33.3%死亡,20.0%继续观察,6.7%转至学术医疗中心或医院;在2L启动者中(中位随访持续时间6.3个月),50.0%失访,25.0%死亡,2憨5.0%继续观察。
停用1L HHI后,观察到缺乏标准化护理且结局欠佳,包括接受2L治疗的情况有限。有必要进一步研究以评估新型BCC治疗选择的影响。