Political violence and inaccurate metaperceptions.
作者信息
Lees Jeffrey
机构信息
Media Forensics Hub, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 10;119(19):e2204045119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204045119. Epub 2022 May 4.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Political violence and inaccurate metaperceptions.政治暴力与不准确的元认知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 10;119(19):e2204045119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204045119. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans' support for partisan violence.纠正不准确的元感知会降低美国人对党派暴力的支持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 19;119(16):e2116851119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116851119. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Inside the opponent's head: perceived losses in group position predict accuracy in metaperceptions between groups.在对手的头脑中：感知到的群体地位损失预测了群体间元认知的准确性。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):951-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412388. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
4
The triple choice: social, political, cultural.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1969 Jan;39(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1969.tb00617.x.
5
Coping with political violence in Northern Ireland.
Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(6):621-4. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90257-8.
6
Do people know how others view them? Two approaches for identifying the accuracy of metaperceptions.人们知道别人如何看待他们吗？两种识别元认知准确性的方法。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Group membership, strength of group identification and perceptions of violence for locations in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰各地区的群体成员身份、群体认同强度及对暴力的认知。
Psychol Rep. 1991 Feb;68(1):95-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.68.1.95.
8
Towards an epidemiology of political violence in the Third World.
Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(7):633-42. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90210-4.
9
Using social constructionist thinking in training social workers living and working under threat of political violence.
Soc Work. 2003 Oct;48(4):545-55. doi: 10.1093/sw/48.4.545.
10
Individual and collective dimensions of resilience within political violence.政治暴力中的个体和集体韧性维度。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2013 Jul;14(3):235-54. doi: 10.1177/1524838013493520.
引用本文的文献
1
Zero-sum beliefs and the avoidance of political conversations.零和信念与避免政治对话。
Commun Psychol. 2024 May 16;2(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00095-4.
本文引用的文献
1
Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans' support for partisan violence.纠正不准确的元感知会降低美国人对党派暴力的支持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 19;119(16):e2116851119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116851119. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Current research overstates American support for political violence.当前的研究高估了美国民众对政治暴力的支持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 22;119(12):e2116870119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116870119. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions.错误极化：认知机制与潜在解决方案。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
4
The general fault in our fault lines.我们断层线上的普遍故障。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1369-1380. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
Understanding and combating misperceived polarization.理解和应对被误解的极化现象。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200143. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0143. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
6
Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans.夸大的元感知预测了美国政治派别人群之间的群体敌意。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 30;117(26):14864-14872. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001263117. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts.在竞争环境中，不准确的群体元认知会导致对负面外部群体的归因。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Mar;4(3):279-286. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.他们将我们视为低人一等：元非人化通过相互非人化预测群体间冲突。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;110(3):343-70. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000044.
9
Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.感知美国的政治极化：党派认同强度和态度极端性加剧了感知到的党派分歧。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):145-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691615569849.
10
Perceptions of a fluid consensus: uniqueness bias, false consensus, false polarization, and pluralistic ignorance in a water conservation crisis.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 May;29(5):559-67. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005001.
Zotero 插件