• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 RT-PCR 检测唾液和鼻咽拭子中的 SARS-CoV-2 结果相似。

SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR was similar.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Rio de Janeiro State University, Brazil.

Department of Endodontic, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2022 Mar-Apr;33(2):68-72. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202204591.

DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202204591
PMID:35508038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9645155/
Abstract

The World Health Organization has declared the widespread spread of SARS-CoV-2 and its associated disease (COVID-19) a public health emergency. The standard gold test for detecting the virus is the RT-PCR, performed from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. However, this test may be uncomfortable for the patient and requires specific training and attire from the health professional responsible for collecting the sample. Therefore, the search for alternative ways to collect samples that may be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 is relevant. This study aimed to compare the results obtained from NPS and saliva samples. NPS and saliva samples were collected from 189 symptomatic outpatients suspected of COVID-19, who came to Piquet Carneiro Polyclinic. RNA extraction was performed using the Bio-Gene DNA/RNA Viral Extraction kit (Bioclin®). Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) reactions used the Molecular SARS-CoV-2 (E / RP) kit (Bio-Manguinhos). The results indicated that 142 showed a non-detectable result (ND), while 47 showed a detectable result (D). Among the 142 "ND", 137 (94.4%) saliva samples obtained the same result, while 5 samples (3.4%) were "D". Among the 47 "D" swab samples, 35 (74.4%) showed the same result in the saliva samples. The sensitivity of the saliva test was 0.74 and the specificity was 0.97. The positive predictive value was 0.88 while the negative predictive value was 0.92. The results showed that detection of Sars-CoV-2 using saliva samples showed high sensitivity and specificity compared to nasopharyngeal swabs.

摘要

世界卫生组织已宣布 SARS-CoV-2 的广泛传播及其相关疾病(COVID-19)为公共卫生紧急事件。检测病毒的标准金测试是 RT-PCR,从鼻咽拭子(NPS)样本中进行。然而,该测试可能会使患者感到不适,并且需要负责采集样本的卫生专业人员进行特定的培训和着装。因此,寻找替代方法来收集可能用于 COVID-19 诊断的样本是相关的。本研究旨在比较 NPS 和唾液样本的结果。从怀疑患有 COVID-19 的 189 名有症状的门诊患者中采集 NPS 和唾液样本,这些患者来到皮凯特·卡内罗综合诊所。使用 Bio-Gene DNA/RNA 病毒提取试剂盒(Bioclin®)进行 RNA 提取。使用实时逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)反应使用 Molecular SARS-CoV-2(E / RP)试剂盒(Bio-Manguinhos)。结果表明,142 个结果显示为不可检测(ND),而 47 个结果显示为可检测(D)。在 142 个“ND”中,137(94.4%)唾液样本获得了相同的结果,而 5 个样本(3.4%)为“D”。在 47 个“D”拭子样本中,35 个(74.4%)在唾液样本中显示出相同的结果。唾液测试的灵敏度为 0.74,特异性为 0.97。阳性预测值为 0.88,阴性预测值为 0.92。结果表明,与鼻咽拭子相比,使用唾液样本检测 Sars-CoV-2 具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。

相似文献

1
SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR was similar.使用 RT-PCR 检测唾液和鼻咽拭子中的 SARS-CoV-2 结果相似。
Braz Dent J. 2022 Mar-Apr;33(2):68-72. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202204591.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
3
Clinical Performance of Direct RT-PCR Testing of Raw Saliva for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals.直接从原始唾液中进行实时 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 以用于有症状和无症状个体的临床检测性能。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0222922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02229-22. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
4
Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru.秘鲁唾液 RT-PCR 和鼻咽拭子抗原检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断性能评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0086122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00861-22. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
5
Comparative evaluation of saliva and nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 detection using RT-qPCR among COVID-19 suspected patients at Jigjiga, Eastern Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚东部吉吉加,对 COVID-19 疑似患者使用 RT-qPCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 时,比较唾液和鼻咽拭子的效果。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 13;18(3):e0282976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282976. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of Mid-turbinate Nasal Swabs, Saliva, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Pediatric Outpatients.儿童门诊患者中鼻甲鼻拭子、唾液和鼻咽拭子用于SARS-CoV-2逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测的比较
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Sep 1;146(9):1056-1061. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0625-SA.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of saliva as a specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.唾液样本用于 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性。
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2022 Oct-Dec;65(4):907-910. doi: 10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_292_21.
8
Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.比较日本 COVID-19 患者鼻咽拭子和唾液标本用于 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 分子检测的效果。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jan;27(1):126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal swab, nasal swab and saliva swab samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR.鼻咽拭子、鼻拭子和唾液拭子样本用于 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Aug;53(8):581-589. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1903550. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Self-collected saliva for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A prospective study in the emergency room.自我采集唾液用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测:急诊科的一项前瞻性研究。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):3268-3272. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26839. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in saliva, stool, and urine samples of COVID-19 patients in Bihar, India.印度比哈尔邦新冠肺炎患者唾液、粪便和尿液样本中SARS-CoV-2病毒的流行情况。
Access Microbiol. 2024 Jun 14;6(6). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000693.v4. eCollection 2024.
2
COVID-19 on Oral Health: A New Bilateral Connection for the Pandemic.新冠疫情对口腔健康的影响:大流行中的一种新的双向关联
Biomedicines. 2023 Dec 26;12(1):60. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12010060.
3
Improving the detection capability and efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 RNA specimens by the specimen turn-around process with multi-department cooperation.多部门合作优化标本周转流程以提高 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 标本的检出率和效率。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1294341. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1294341. eCollection 2023.
4
Acceptability and Feasibility of Saliva-delivered PCR Coronavirus 2019 Tests for Young Children.唾液PCR 新冠病毒 2019 检测在幼儿中的可接受性和可行性。
Pediatrics. 2023 Jul 1;152(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352D.
5
Salivary SARS-CoV-2 RNA for diagnosis of COVID-19 patients: a systematic revisew and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.用于诊断COVID-19患者的唾液严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)RNA:诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2023 Jun 21;59:219-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.06.004.

本文引用的文献

1
Pooled Saliva Specimens for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的 pooled saliva specimens。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;59(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02486-20.
2
Sensitivity of midturbinate versus nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).中鼻甲拭子与鼻咽拭子检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的敏感性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;42(8):1001-1003. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1326. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid.龈沟液中 SARS-CoV-2 的检测。
J Dent Res. 2021 Feb;100(2):187-193. doi: 10.1177/0022034520970536. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.比较日本 COVID-19 患者鼻咽拭子和唾液标本用于 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 分子检测的效果。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jan;27(1):126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的唾液或鼻咽拭子样本
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1283-1286. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016359. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
6
Challenges in use of saliva for detection of SARS CoV-2 RNA in symptomatic outpatients.用于检测有症状门诊患者的 SARS CoV-2 RNA 时唾液样本使用的挑战。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Sep;130:104567. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104567. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
7
Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用 RT-PCR 检测不同类型临床标本中的 SARS-CoV-2:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):719-725. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26349. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
8
Rapid detection of novel coronavirus/Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification.通过逆转录环介导等温扩增技术快速检测新型冠状病毒/严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234682. eCollection 2020.
9
Saliva as an Alternate Specimen Source for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients Using Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2.使用赛沛Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2检测有症状患者唾液作为检测SARS-CoV-2的替代样本来源
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01109-20.
10
SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in urine, blood, anal swabs, and oropharyngeal swabs specimens.SARS-CoV-2 可在尿液、血液、肛拭子和咽拭子标本中检测到。
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1676-1680. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25936. Epub 2020 Apr 30.