Suppr超能文献

PCSK9 抑制剂和依折麦布降低心血管事件风险的临床实践指南:基于风险分层的推荐意见。

PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe for the reduction of cardiovascular events: a clinical practice guideline with risk-stratified recommendations.

机构信息

The Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics/National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 2022 May 4;377:e069066. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069066.

Abstract

CLINICAL QUESTION

In adults with low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels >1.8 mmol/L (>70 mg/dL) who are already taking the maximum dose of statins or are intolerant to statins, should another lipid-lowering drug be added, either a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor or ezetimibe, to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events? If so, which drug is preferred? Having decided to use one, should we add the other lipid-lowering drug?

CURRENT PRACTICE

Most guidelines emphasise LDL cholesterol targets in their recommendations for prescribing PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe in adults at high risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event. However, to achieve these goals in very high risk patients with statins alone is almost impossible, so physicians are increasingly considering other lipid-lowering drugs solely for achieving LDL cholesterol treatment goals rather than for achieving important absolute cardiovascular risk reduction. Most guidelines do not systematically assess the cardiovascular benefits of adding PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe for all risk groups across primary and secondary prevention, nor do they report, in accordance with explicit judgments of assumed patients' values and preferences, absolute benefits and harms and potential treatment burdens.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The guideline panel provided mostly weak recommendations, which means we rely on shared decision making when applying these recommendations. For adults already using statins, the panel suggests adding a second lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but recommends against adding it in people at low cardiovascular risk. For adults who are intolerant to statins, the panel recommends using a lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but against adding it in those at low cardiovascular risk. When choosing to add another lipid-lowering drug, the panel suggests ezetimibe in preference to PCSK9 inhibitors. The panel suggests further adding a PCSK9 inhibitor to ezetimibe for adults already taking statins at very high risk and those at very high and high risk who are intolerant to statins.

HOW THIS GUIDELINE WAS CREATED

An international panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations following standards for trustworthy guidelines and using the GRADE approach. The panel identified four risk groups of patients (low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular risk) and primarily applied an individual patient perspective in moving from evidence to recommendations, though societal issues were a secondary consideration. The panel considered the balance of benefits and harms and burdens of starting a PCSK9 inhibitor and/or ezetimibe, making assumptions of adults' average values and preferences. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids accompany multi-layered recommendations, developed in an online authoring and publication platform (www.magicapp.org) that also allows re-use and adaptation.

THE EVIDENCE

A linked systematic review and network meta-analysis (14 trials including 83 660 participants) of benefits found that PCSK9 inhibitors or ezetimibe probably reduce myocardial infarctions and stroke in patients with very high and high cardiovascular risk, with no impact on mortality (moderate to high certainty evidence), but not in those with moderate and low cardiovascular risk. PCSK9 inhibitors may have similar effects to ezetimibe on reducing non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke (low certainty evidence). These relative benefits were consistent, but their absolute magnitude varied based on cardiovascular risk in individual patients (for example, for 1000 people treated with PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to statins over five years, benefits ranged from 2 fewer strokes in the lowest risk to 21 fewer in the highest risk). Two systematic reviews on harms found no important adverse events for these drugs (moderate to high certainty evidence). PCSK9 inhibitors require injections that sometimes result in injection site reactions (best estimate 15 more per 1000 in a 5 year timeframe), representing a burden and harm that may matter to patients. The MATCH-IT decision support tool allows you to interact with the evidence and your patients across the alternative options: https://magicevidence.org/match-it/220504dist-lipid-lowering-drugs/.

UNDERSTANDING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The stratification into four cardiovascular risk groups means that, to use the recommendations, physicians need to identify their patient's risk first. We therefore suggest, specific to various geographical regions, using some reliable risk calculators that estimate patients' cardiovascular risk based on a mix of known risk factors. The largely weak recommendations concerning the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors reflect what the panel considered to be a close balance between small reductions in stroke and myocardial infarctions weighed against the burdens and limited harms.Because of the anticipated large variability of patients' values and preferences, well informed choices warrant shared decision making. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids linked to the recommendations can facilitate such shared decisions. The strong recommendations against adding another drug in people at low cardiovascular risk reflect what the panel considered to be a burden without important benefits. The strong recommendation for adding either ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors in people at high and very high cardiovascular risk reflect a clear benefit.The panel recognised the key uncertainty in the evidence concerning patient values and preferences, namely that what most people consider important reductions in cardiovascular risks, weighed against burdens and harms, remains unclear. Finally, availability and costs will influence decisions when healthcare systems, clinicians, or people consider adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors.

摘要

临床问题

对于低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平> 1.8 mmol/L(> 70 mg/dL)且已服用最大剂量他汀类药物或不耐受他汀类药物的成年人,是否应添加另一种降脂药物,即前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素/ kexin 9(PCSK9)抑制剂或依折麦布,以降低主要心血管事件的风险?如果是这样,哪种药物更优先?决定使用一种药物后,我们是否应该添加另一种降脂药物?

当前实践

大多数指南在建议高风险发生重大不良心血管事件的成年人使用 PCSK9 抑制剂和/或依折麦布时,强调 LDL 胆固醇目标。然而,仅用他汀类药物治疗极高危患者几乎不可能达到这些目标,因此医生越来越多地考虑单独使用其他降脂药物,而不是为了达到 LDL 胆固醇治疗目标,而是为了实现重要的绝对心血管风险降低。大多数指南并没有系统地评估在所有一级和二级预防风险组中添加 PCSK9 抑制剂和/或依折麦布的心血管益处,也没有按照明确判断的假定患者价值观和偏好,报告绝对益处和危害以及潜在的治疗负担。

建议

指南小组主要提供了弱推荐,这意味着我们在应用这些推荐时依赖于共同决策。对于已经使用他汀类药物的成年人,建议在极高危和高危心血管风险的人群中添加第二种降脂药物,但不建议在低心血管风险的人群中添加。对于不耐受他汀类药物的成年人,建议在极高危和高危心血管风险的人群中使用降脂药物,但不建议在低心血管风险的人群中添加。在选择添加另一种降脂药物时,建议优先使用依折麦布而非 PCSK9 抑制剂。建议对已服用他汀类药物的极高危人群和不耐受他汀类药物的极高危和高危人群,进一步添加 PCSK9 抑制剂联合依折麦布。

如何制定本指南

一个国际小组,包括患者、临床医生和方法学家,遵循可信指南的标准并使用 GRADE 方法,制定了这些建议。小组确定了四个风险组的患者(低、中、高和极高心血管风险),主要从证据到建议采用个体患者的角度出发,但社会问题是次要考虑因素。小组考虑了开始使用 PCSK9 抑制剂和/或依折麦布的益处和危害以及负担的平衡,对成年人的平均价值观和偏好进行了假设。交互式证据摘要和决策辅助工具伴随分层推荐一起开发,这些推荐在一个在线编写和发布平台(www.magicapp.org)上进行,该平台还允许重新使用和改编。

证据

一项包括 14 项试验的有链接的系统评价和网络荟萃分析(涉及 83660 名参与者),对益处进行了评估,发现 PCSK9 抑制剂或依折麦布可能降低极高危和高危心血管风险患者的心肌梗死和中风风险,对死亡率没有影响(中等至高度确定性证据),但对中危和低危心血管风险患者没有影响。PCSK9 抑制剂在降低非致命性心肌梗死或中风方面可能与依折麦布具有相似的效果(低确定性证据)。这些相对益处是一致的,但它们的绝对幅度因个体患者的心血管风险而异(例如,对于 1000 名接受他汀类药物加 PCSK9 抑制剂治疗的患者,在五年内,风险最低的患者中风减少 2 次,风险最高的患者中风减少 21 次)。两项关于危害的系统评价发现这些药物没有重要的不良事件(中等至高度确定性证据)。PCSK9 抑制剂需要注射,有时会导致注射部位反应(最佳估计值为每 1000 人在 5 年内增加 15 次),这可能对患者造成负担和危害。MATCH-IT 决策支持工具允许您在各种替代方案中与证据和您的患者进行交互:https://magicevidence.org/match-it/220504dist-lipid-lowering-drugs/。

理解建议

分层到四个心血管风险组意味着,为了使用这些建议,医生首先需要确定患者的风险。因此,我们建议特定于各个地理区域,使用一些可靠的风险计算器,这些计算器根据已知的风险因素来估计患者的心血管风险。由于对患者价值观和偏好的高度不确定性,明智的选择需要共同决策。与建议相关联的交互式证据摘要和决策辅助工具可以促进这种共同决策。在低心血管风险患者中添加依折麦布或 PCSK9 抑制剂的弱推荐反映了小组认为在中风和心肌梗死减少与负担和有限危害之间存在密切平衡。由于预计患者的价值观和偏好会有很大的差异,因此充分知情的选择需要共同决策。与建议相关联的交互式证据摘要和决策辅助工具可以促进这种共同决策。在低心血管风险患者中添加依折麦布或 PCSK9 抑制剂的弱推荐反映了小组认为在中风和心肌梗死减少与负担和有限危害之间存在密切平衡。由于预计患者的价值观和偏好会有很大的差异,因此充分知情的选择需要共同决策。与建议相关联的交互式证据摘要和决策辅助工具可以促进这种共同决策。在低心血管风险患者中添加依折麦布或 PCSK9 抑制剂的弱推荐反映了小组认为在中风和心肌梗死减少与负担和有限危害之间存在密切平衡。由于预计患者的价值观和偏好会有很大的差异,因此充分知情的选择需要共同决策。

互动证据总结和决策辅助工具链接到建议可以促进这种共同决策。强烈建议在高危和极高危心血管风险患者中添加依折麦布或 PCSK9 抑制剂,反映了明确的益处。小组认识到证据中关于患者价值观和偏好的关键不确定性,即大多数人认为重要的心血管风险降低与负担和危害之间的权衡仍不清楚。最后,当医疗保健系统、临床医生或人们考虑添加依折麦布或 PCSK9 抑制剂时,可用性和成本将影响决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验