• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中癌症患者需求评估:一项群组随机对照试验(cRCT)的研究方案,对需求评估工具癌症(CANAssess)进行经济评估和规范化进程理论评估。

Cancer patients' needs assessment in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT), economic evaluation and normalisation process theory evaluation of the needs assessment tool cancer (CANAssess).

机构信息

Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, UK

Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 4;12(5):e051394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051394.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051394
PMID:35508352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9073401/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Unmet needs in patients with cancer and their carers are common but poorly identified and addressed. The Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) is a structured consultation guide to identify and triage patient and carer unmet needs. The NAT-C is validated, but its effectiveness in reducing unmet patient and carer needs in primary care is unknown.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Cluster randomised controlled trial with internal pilot and embedded process evaluation to test the clinical and cost effectiveness of the NAT-C in primary care for people with active cancer in reducing unmet patient and carer need, compared with usual care. We will recruit 1080 patients with active cancer (and carers if relevant) from 54 general practices in England.Participating practices will be randomised 1:1 to either deliver an NAT-guided clinical consultation plus usual care or to usual care alone. Consenting participants with active cancer and their carers (if nominated) will be asked to complete study questionnaires at baseline, 1 and 3 months for all, 6 months except for those recruited outside of the last 3 months of recruitment, and attend an NAT-C appointment if allocated to an intervention practice. An internal pilot will assess: site and participant recruitment, intervention uptake and follow-up rates. The primary outcome, the proportion of patients with an unmet need on the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34 at 3 months postregistration, will be analysed using a multilevel logistic regression. Mixed-methods process evaluation informed by Normalisation Process Theory will use quantitative survey and interview data from clinicians and key stakeholders in cancer care to develop an implementation strategy for nationwide rollout of the NAT-C if the intervention is cost-effective.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval from London-Surrey REC (20/LO/0312). Results will be peer-reviewed, published and made available to research participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN15497400.

摘要

简介

癌症患者及其照护者的未满足需求很常见,但往往难以识别和处理。需求评估工具-癌症(NAT-C)是一种结构化的咨询指南,用于识别和分类患者和照护者的未满足需求。NAT-C 经过验证,但它在初级保健中降低癌症患者和照护者未满足需求的有效性尚不清楚。

方法和分析

这是一项具有内部试点和嵌入式过程评估的集群随机对照试验,旨在测试 NAT-C 在初级保健中用于患有活动性癌症的人群的临床和成本效益,以降低未满足的患者和照护者的需求,与常规护理相比。我们将从英格兰的 54 家普通诊所招募 1080 名患有活动性癌症的患者(如果相关,还有照护者)。参与的诊所将以 1:1 的比例随机分配到接受 NAT 指导的临床咨询加常规护理或仅接受常规护理。所有患者和照护者(如果提名)将被要求在基线、1 个月和 3 个月完成研究问卷,除了那些在招募最后 3 个月之外招募的患者,将在 6 个月时完成,并且如果分配到干预诊所,将接受 NAT-C 预约。内部试点将评估:地点和参与者招募、干预接受率和随访率。主要结局是在登记后 3 个月时,有多少患者在支持性护理需求调查短表 34 上有未满足的需求,将使用多级逻辑回归进行分析。基于规范过程理论的混合方法过程评估将使用来自癌症护理临床医生和关键利益相关者的定量调查和访谈数据,为如果干预具有成本效益,则在全国范围内推出 NAT-C 制定实施策略。

伦理和传播

伦敦-萨里 REC 批准[伦理编号]。结果将经过同行评审,发表,并提供给研究参与者。

试验注册编号

ISRCTN8416641。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9887/9073401/cf878ea94a3b/bmjopen-2021-051394f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9887/9073401/265a2604fd59/bmjopen-2021-051394f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9887/9073401/cf878ea94a3b/bmjopen-2021-051394f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9887/9073401/265a2604fd59/bmjopen-2021-051394f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9887/9073401/cf878ea94a3b/bmjopen-2021-051394f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Cancer patients' needs assessment in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT), economic evaluation and normalisation process theory evaluation of the needs assessment tool cancer (CANAssess).基层医疗中癌症患者需求评估:一项群组随机对照试验(cRCT)的研究方案,对需求评估工具癌症(CANAssess)进行经济评估和规范化进程理论评估。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 4;12(5):e051394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051394.
2
A cluster randomised trial of a Needs Assessment Tool for adult Cancer patients and their carers (NAT-C) in primary care: A feasibility study.一项针对成人癌症患者及其照顾者的需求评估工具(NAT-C)在初级保健中的应用的整群随机试验:一项可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0245647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245647. eCollection 2021.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Needs Assessment Tool-Progressive Disease Cancer in U.K. Primary Care.需要评估工具-进展性疾病癌症在英国初级保健中的心理测量特性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):602-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
Organising Support for Carers of Stroke Survivors (OSCARSS): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial, including health economic analysis.为中风幸存者照料者提供组织支持(OSCARSS):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案,包括卫生经济学分析。
Trials. 2019 Jan 7;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3104-7.
5
Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study).基层医疗中抑郁症的债务咨询:一项适应性随机对照试验(DeCoDer研究)。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jun;21(35):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta21350.
6
7
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.居家临终患者按需皮下注射治疗突破性症状的照护者管理:CARiAD 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250.
8
An intervention to support stroke survivors and their carers in the longer term (LoTS2Care): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.一项长期支持中风幸存者及其护理人员的干预措施(LoTS2Care):一项整群随机对照可行性试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jun 11;19(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2669-5.
9
10
Effectiveness of a digitally supported care management programme to reduce unmet needs of family caregivers of people with dementia: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial (GAIN).数字化支持的护理管理方案对减少痴呆患者家庭照顾者未满足需求的效果:一项群组随机对照试验(GAIN)的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jun 16;22(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05290-w.

本文引用的文献

1
A cluster randomised trial of a Needs Assessment Tool for adult Cancer patients and their carers (NAT-C) in primary care: A feasibility study.一项针对成人癌症患者及其照顾者的需求评估工具(NAT-C)在初级保健中的应用的整群随机试验:一项可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0245647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245647. eCollection 2021.
2
Baseline testing in cluster randomised controlled trials: should this be done?在整群随机对照试验中进行基线测试:是否应该这样做?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 17;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0750-8.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Needs Assessment Tool-Progressive Disease Cancer in U.K. Primary Care.
需要评估工具-进展性疾病癌症在英国初级保健中的心理测量特性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):602-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
Values for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluation at end of life.用于生命末期经济评估的 ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) 值。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:114-128. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
5
Prescribed opioids in primary care: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of influence of patient and practice characteristics.初级保健中开具的阿片类药物:患者和医疗实践特征影响的横断面和纵向分析
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010276.
6
An investigation into the construct validity of the Carer Experience Scale (CES).照顾者体验量表(CES)结构效度的调查。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Aug;23(6):1743-52. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0616-1. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
7
Symptoms, unbearability and the nature of suffering in terminal cancer patients dying at home: a prospective primary care study.终末期癌症在家中死亡患者的症状、难以忍受程度和痛苦本质:一项前瞻性初级保健研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Dec 28;14:201. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-201.
8
Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews.评估终末期关怀中的复杂干预措施:MORECare 声明——通过透明专家咨询和系统评价综合产生的良好实践。
BMC Med. 2013 Apr 24;11:111. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-111.
9
Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: review and recommendations.癌症患者的痛苦和未满足需求筛查:综述与建议。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1160-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5509. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
Improving outcomes for people with progressive cancer: interrupted time series trial of a needs assessment intervention.改善进展性癌症患者的结局:一项需求评估干预的中断时间序列试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Mar;43(3):569-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 Dec 30.