Suppr超能文献

经支气管肺活检与经支气管肺冷冻活检在不明原因急性低氧性呼吸衰竭危重症患者中的对比研究。

Transbronchial lung biopsy versus transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in critically ill patients with undiagnosed acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital; National Center for Respiratory Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases; Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 2 Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.

Department of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2022 May 4;22(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01966-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure whose diagnosis is not established after initial evaluation, obtaining a histopathological diagnosis may improve the patients' prognosis. This study aims to compare the safety profile and diagnostic yields between transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) in these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted in a 26-bed intensive care unit over a 5-year period. The consecutive patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who underwent TBLB or TBLC were included to determine the potential etiology. Patients characteristics, procedure related complications, pathological and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnostic yields, treatment modification and 28-day survival were analyzed. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-five and 25 consecutive patients underwent TBLB and TBLC, respectively. The patients underwent TBLC were more critical. There was no significant difference in overall procedure related complications of patients underwent TBLB and TBLC [15.6% (7/45) vs 28.0% (7/25), p = 0.212]. The rate of pathological diagnostic yield [72.0% (18/25) vs 37.8% (17/45), p = 0.006], MDD diagnostic yield [84.0% (21/25) vs 55.6% (25/45), p = 0.016] and subsequent treatment modification [84.0% (21/25) vs 57.8% (26/45), p = 0.025] in patients underwent TBLC were significantly higher than those in patients underwent TBLB. Multivariate analysis revealed that MDD diagnosis [HR 0.193 (95% CI 0.047-0.792), p = 0.022] and treatment modification [HR 0.204 (95% CI 0.065-0.638), p = 0.006] may be prognostic protective factors.

CONCLUSIONS

TBLC can lead to an increased chance of establishing a diagnosis, which could significantly improve the patients' prognosis, with an acceptable safety profile.

摘要

背景

在初始评估后仍未明确诊断的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者中,获取组织病理学诊断可能改善患者的预后。本研究旨在比较经支气管肺活检(TBLB)和经支气管肺冷冻活检(TBLC)在这些患者中的安全性和诊断效果。

方法

这是一项在 5 年内进行的回顾性对比研究,在一个拥有 26 张床位的重症监护病房中进行。纳入了接受 TBLB 或 TBLC 以确定潜在病因的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭连续患者。分析了患者特征、与操作相关的并发症、病理和多学科讨论(MDD)诊断率、治疗改变和 28 天生存率。通过 Cox 回归分析确定预后因素。

结果

45 例和 25 例连续患者分别接受了 TBLB 和 TBLC。TBLC 组患者病情更危急。两组患者的总操作相关并发症发生率无显著差异[15.6%(7/45)比 28.0%(7/25),p=0.212]。TBLC 组的病理诊断率[72.0%(25/25)比 37.8%(17/45),p=0.006]、MDD 诊断率[84.0%(21/25)比 55.6%(25/45),p=0.016]和随后的治疗改变率[84.0%(21/25)比 57.8%(26/45),p=0.025]均显著高于 TBLB 组。多变量分析显示,MDD 诊断[HR 0.193(95% CI 0.047-0.792),p=0.022]和治疗改变[HR 0.204(95% CI 0.065-0.638),p=0.006]可能是预后的保护因素。

结论

TBLC 可提高明确诊断的机会,显著改善患者的预后,且安全性可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0041/9069771/0b2e9308980a/12890_2022_1966_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验