Department of Hepatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Center for Pathogen Biology and Infectious Diseases, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep;37(9):1806-1814. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15881. Epub 2022 May 12.
Quantitative hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) level has been reported to predict significant liver inflammation in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, little evidence has been revealed that qAnti-HBc alone or with other serum parameters in predicting moderate to severe hepatic inflammation in HBeAg-positive immune active patients treated with entecavir (ETV).
A total of 142 patients with HBeAg-positive immune active hepatitis were recruited in our study. Serum liver biochemistry, qAnti-HBc, hepatitis B virus markers, and liver inflammation were evaluated during 48-week ETV treatment. The association between liver inflammation grades and serum markers was systematically analyzed.
The patients with moderate to severe inflammation (≥ G2) had a significantly higher level of qAnti-HBc compared with those with no to mild liver inflammation patients (< G2). The levels of qAnti-HBc and alanine transaminase (ALT) were positively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades, and qAnti-HBc had a better correlation than ALT, whereas HBsAg was negatively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades before treatment. After 48-week ETV treatment, no correlation was observed between hepatic inflammation grades and qAnti-HBc, ALT, or HBsAg. The combination of qAnti-HBc, ALT, and HBsAg had better performance in predicting significant liver inflammation (≥ G2) than qAnti-HBc alone or its combination with ALT.
Serum qAnti-HBc levels were positively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades before treatment, but no positive correlation between them was observed after 48-week treatment. The level of qAnti-HBc combined with ALT and HBsAg may serve as a more reliable marker for identifying significant liver inflammation before treatment in HBeAg-positive immune active patients.
已有研究报道,定量乙型肝炎核心抗体(qAnti-HBc)水平可预测初治慢性乙型肝炎患者的显著肝脏炎症。然而,尚缺乏证据表明 qAnti-HBc 单独或与其他血清参数联合用于预测恩替卡韦(ETV)治疗的 HBeAg 阳性免疫活跃患者的中重度肝炎症。
本研究共纳入 142 例 HBeAg 阳性免疫活跃性肝炎患者。在 ETV 治疗的 48 周期间,评估血清肝生化、qAnti-HBc、乙型肝炎病毒标志物和肝脏炎症。系统分析了肝炎症分级与血清标志物之间的关系。
与无至轻度肝炎症患者(<G2)相比,中重度炎症(≥G2)患者的 qAnti-HBc 水平显著更高。qAnti-HBc 和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平与肝炎症分级呈正相关,qAnti-HBc 的相关性优于 ALT,而 HBsAg 与治疗前肝炎症分级呈负相关。经过 48 周 ETV 治疗后,肝炎症分级与 qAnti-HBc、ALT 或 HBsAg 之间无相关性。qAnti-HBc、ALT 和 HBsAg 的联合检测在预测显著肝炎症(≥G2)方面优于 qAnti-HBc 单独或与 ALT 联合检测。
治疗前血清 qAnti-HBc 水平与肝炎症分级呈正相关,但 48 周治疗后两者之间无正相关关系。qAnti-HBc 联合 ALT 和 HBsAg 水平可能是 HBeAg 阳性免疫活跃患者治疗前识别显著肝炎症的更可靠标志物。