Khan Abu Baker, Ahmad Aftab, Ahmad Saad, Gul Maryam, Iqbal Fatima, Ullah Hazrat, Laiba Syeda, Orakzai Umer Khayaam
Surgery, District Headquarter Hospital, Dera Ismail Khan, PAK.
Internal Medicine, Category D Hospital, South Waziristan, PAK.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 1;14(4):e23731. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23731. eCollection 2022 Apr.
To analyze the effect of Inhaled insulin in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and compare it with other routes of administration of Insulin. A systemic search was conducted from the following electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, from inception to 28th January 2022. All statistical analysis was conducted in Review Manager 5.4.1. All studies meeting inclusion criteria were selected. A random-effect model was used to pool the studies, and the result was reported in the Standard Mean Difference (SMD), Mean Difference (MD), and Risk Ratio (RR) with their corresponding 95% Confidence interval (CI). Thirteen randomized control trials were selected for our meta-analysis. Statistically significant results were obtained for comparing change in weight after insulin administration (MD= -1.08 [-1.21, -0.94]; p< 0.00001; I2= 74%). Other factors assessed were found to be non-significant like HbA1c (SMD= 0.03 [-0.80, 0.86]; p= 0.95; I2= 99%), fasting blood sugar (SMD= -0.31 [-1.52, 0.91]; p= 0.62; I2= 99%) and adverse effects (RR= 1.06 [0.97, 1.16]; p= 0.18; I2= 96%). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that inhaled insulin is equally effective as subcutaneously administered insulin in patients with Type 1 Diabetes. The inhaled insulin was found to show less weight gain and fewer hypoglycemic shifts, with a similar effect on the blood glucose level. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events.
分析吸入性胰岛素在1型糖尿病中的作用,并将其与胰岛素的其他给药途径进行比较。从以下电子数据库进行了全面检索:PubMed/Medline、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术,检索时间从建库至2022年1月28日。所有统计分析均在Review Manager 5.4.1中进行。选择所有符合纳入标准的研究。采用随机效应模型对研究进行汇总,并以标准均数差(SMD)、均数差(MD)和风险比(RR)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)报告结果。我们的荟萃分析选择了13项随机对照试验。在比较胰岛素给药后体重变化时获得了具有统计学意义的结果(MD = -1.08 [-1.21, -0.94];p < 0.00001;I² = 74%)。发现评估的其他因素无统计学意义,如糖化血红蛋白(SMD = 0.03 [-0.80, 0.86];p = 0.95;I² = 99%)、空腹血糖(SMD = -0.31 [-1.52, 0.91];p = 0.62;I² = 99%)和不良反应(RR = 1.06 [0.97, 1.16];p = 0.18;I² = 96%)。在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们发现吸入性胰岛素在1型糖尿病患者中与皮下注射胰岛素同样有效。发现吸入性胰岛素体重增加较少,低血糖波动较少,对血糖水平的影响相似。不良反应发生率未观察到显著差异。