German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Conserv Biol. 2022 Oct;36(5):e13930. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13930. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Soil biodiversity and related ecosystem functions are neglected in most biodiversity assessments and nature conservation actions. We examined how society, and particularly policy makers, have addressed these factors worldwide with a focus on Europe and explored the role of soils in nature conservation in Germany as an example. We reviewed past and current global and European policies, compared soil ecosystem functioning in- and outside protected areas, and examined the role of soils in nature conservation management via text analyses. Protection and conservation of soil biodiversity and soil ecosystem functioning have been insufficient. Soil-related policies are unenforceable and lack soil biodiversity conservation goals, focusing instead on other environmental objectives. We found no evidence of positive effects of current nature conservation measures in multiple soil ecosystem functions in Europe. In German conservation management, soils are considered only from a limited perspective (e.g., as physicochemical part of the environment and as habitat for aboveground organisms). By exploring policy, evidence, and management as it relates to soil ecosystems, we suggest an integrative perspective to move nature conservation toward targeting soil ecosystems directly (e.g., by setting baselines, monitoring soil threats, and establishing a soil indicator system).
土壤生物多样性和相关生态系统功能在大多数生物多样性评估和自然保护行动中被忽视。我们研究了全球范围内,特别是在欧洲,社会,特别是政策制定者是如何解决这些因素的,并以德国为例探讨了土壤在自然保护中的作用。我们回顾了过去和当前的全球和欧洲政策,比较了保护区内外的土壤生态系统功能,并通过文本分析研究了土壤在自然保护管理中的作用。土壤生物多样性和土壤生态系统功能的保护和养护一直不足。与土壤有关的政策无法执行,缺乏土壤生物多样性保护目标,而是侧重于其他环境目标。我们没有发现欧洲当前自然保护措施对多种土壤生态系统功能产生积极影响的证据。在德国的保护管理中,土壤仅从有限的角度(例如,作为环境的理化部分和地上生物的栖息地)来考虑。通过探索与土壤生态系统相关的政策、证据和管理,我们建议采取综合的观点,将自然保护直接针对土壤生态系统(例如,通过设定基线、监测土壤威胁和建立土壤指标系统)。