Suppr超能文献

动态脑自动调节传递函数分析:带通还是不带通?

: Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: To band or not to band?

机构信息

Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023 Sep;43(9):1628-1630. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221098448. Epub 2022 May 5.

Abstract

Transfer function analysis (TFA) is the most frequently adopted method for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) with continuously recorded arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV). Conventionally, values of autoregulatory metrics (e.g., gain and phase) derived from TFA are averaged within three frequency bands separated by cut-off frequencies at 0.07 Hz and 0.20 Hz, respectively, to represent the efficiency of dynamic CA. However, this is of increasing concerns, as there remains no solid evidence for choosing these specific cut-off frequencies, and the rigid adoption of these bands can stifle further developments in TFA of dynamic CA. In this 'Point-Counterpoint' mini-review, we provide evidence against the fixed banding, indicate possible alternatives, and call for awareness of the risk of the 'one-size-fits-all' banding becoming dogmatic. We conclude that we need to remain open to the multiple possibilities offered by TFA to realize its full potential in studies of human dynamic CA.

摘要

传递函数分析(TFA)是评估连续记录的动脉血压(ABP)和脑血流速度(CBFV)的动态脑自动调节(CA)的最常用方法。传统上,从 TFA 得出的自动调节指标(例如增益和相位)的值在通过截止频率分别为 0.07 Hz 和 0.20 Hz 分隔的三个频带内平均,以表示动态 CA 的效率。然而,这引起了越来越多的关注,因为选择这些特定截止频率尚无确凿的证据,并且严格采用这些频带可能会阻碍 TFA 对动态 CA 的进一步发展。在这个“观点交锋”的小型评论中,我们提供了反对固定频带的证据,指出了可能的替代方案,并呼吁注意“一刀切”频带的风险变得教条化。我们的结论是,我们需要对 TFA 提供的多种可能性持开放态度,以在人类动态 CA 的研究中充分发挥其潜力。

相似文献

3
Wavelet phase synchronization analysis of cerebral blood flow autoregulation.脑血流自动调节的小波相位同步分析。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Apr;57(4):960-8. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2024265. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
5
The upper frequency limit of dynamic cerebral autoregulation.动态脑自动调节的上频率限制。
J Physiol. 2019 Dec;597(24):5821-5833. doi: 10.1113/JP278710. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
8
Assessment of dynamic changes in cerebral autoregulation.脑自动调节的动态变化评估
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2007 Feb;52(1):31-6. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2007.007.

本文引用的文献

2
The upper frequency limit of dynamic cerebral autoregulation.动态脑自动调节的上频率限制。
J Physiol. 2019 Dec;597(24):5821-5833. doi: 10.1113/JP278710. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
5
Assessment of cerebral autoregulation: the quandary of quantification.脑自动调节评估:量化的困境。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Sep 15;303(6):H658-71. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00328.2012. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
6
Multiple coherence of cerebral blood flow velocity in humans.人类脑血流速度的多重相干性
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Jul;291(1):H251-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01348.2005. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
9
Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans.人类动态脑自动调节的传递函数分析
Am J Physiol. 1998 Jan;274(1 Pt 2):H233-41. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.1.h233.
10
The frequency-dependent behavior of cerebral autoregulation.
Neurosurgery. 1990 Sep;27(3):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199009000-00004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验