• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种具有优越判别能力的传递函数分析的数据驱动方法:动态脑自动调节的优化评估。

A Data-Driven Approach to Transfer Function Analysis for Superior Discriminative Power: Optimized Assessment of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation.

出版信息

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Apr;25(4):909-921. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3015907. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2020.3015907
PMID:32780704
Abstract

Transfer function analysis (TFA) is extensively used to assess human physiological functions. However, extracting parameters from TFA is not usually optimized for detecting impaired function. In this study, we propose to use data-driven approaches to improve the performance of TFA in assessing blood flow control in the brain (dynamic cerebral autoregulation, dCA). Data were collected from two distinct groups of subjects deemed to have normal and impaired dCA. Continuous arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) were simultaneously recorded for approximately 10 mins in 82 subjects (including 41 healthy controls) to give 328 labeled samples of the TFA variables. The recordings were further divided into 4,294 short data segments to generate 17,176 unlabeled samples of the TFA variables. We optimized TFA post-processing with a generic semi-supervised learning strategy and a novel semi-supervised stacked ensemble learning (SSEL) strategy for classification into normal and impaired dCA. The generic strategy led to a performance with no significant difference to that of the conventional dCA analysis methods, whereas the proposed new strategy boosted the performance of TFA to an accuracy of 93.3%. To our knowledge, this is the best dCA discrimination performance obtained to date and the first attempt at optimizing TFA through machine learning techniques. Equivalent methods can potentially also be applied to assessing a wide spectrum of other human physiological functions.

摘要

传递函数分析(TFA)广泛用于评估人体生理功能。然而,从 TFA 中提取参数通常不能优化用于检测功能障碍。在这项研究中,我们提出使用数据驱动的方法来提高 TFA 在评估大脑血流控制(动态脑自动调节,dCA)方面的性能。数据来自两组被认为具有正常和受损 dCA 的不同受试者。在 82 名受试者(包括 41 名健康对照者)中,约 10 分钟内同时记录连续动脉血压(ABP)和脑血流速度(CBFV),以获得 TFA 变量的 328 个标记样本。记录进一步分为 4294 个短数据段,以生成 TFA 变量的 17176 个未标记样本。我们使用通用半监督学习策略和新颖的半监督堆叠集成学习(SSEL)策略对 TFA 进行了后处理优化,以对正常和受损 dCA 进行分类。通用策略导致的性能与传统 dCA 分析方法没有显著差异,而提出的新策略将 TFA 的性能提高到了 93.3%的准确率。据我们所知,这是迄今为止获得的最佳 dCA 判别性能,也是首次尝试通过机器学习技术优化 TFA。等效方法也可能潜在地应用于评估广泛的其他人体生理功能。

相似文献

1
A Data-Driven Approach to Transfer Function Analysis for Superior Discriminative Power: Optimized Assessment of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation.一种具有优越判别能力的传递函数分析的数据驱动方法:动态脑自动调节的优化评估。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Apr;25(4):909-921. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3015907. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Separation of normal and impaired dynamic cerebral autoregulation using deep embedded clustering: a proof-of-concept study.使用深度嵌入聚类分离正常和受损的动态脑血流自动调节:一项概念验证研究。
Physiol Meas. 2021 Jul 28;42(7). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac0e81.
3
COHmax: an algorithm to maximise coherence in estimates of dynamic cerebral autoregulation.COHmax:一种最大化动态脑自动调节估计相干性的算法。
Physiol Meas. 2020 Sep 4;41(8):085003. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aba67e.
4
Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation based on spontaneous fluctuations in arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure.基于动脉血压和颅内压自发波动的动态脑自动调节评估。
Physiol Meas. 2002 Feb;23(1):59-72. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/23/1/306.
5
Estimating confidence intervals for cerebral autoregulation: a parametric bootstrap approach.估算脑自动调节的置信区间:一种参数 bootstrap 方法。
Physiol Meas. 2021 Oct 29;42(10). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac27b8.
6
Joint time-frequency analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation using generalized harmonic wavelets.基于广义谐波小波的动态脑自动调节的联合时频分析。
Physiol Meas. 2020 Mar 6;41(2):024002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab71f2.
7
Point-Counterpoint: Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: To band or not to band?观点对垒:动态脑自动调节的传递函数分析:带通滤波还是不带通滤波?
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023 Sep;43(9):1625-1627. doi: 10.1177/0271678X231182245. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
8
Between-centre variability in transfer function analysis, a widely used method for linear quantification of the dynamic pressure-flow relation: the CARNet study.在转移函数分析中的中心间变异性,这是一种广泛用于线性量化动态压力流量关系的方法:CARNet 研究。
Med Eng Phys. 2014 May;36(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
9
Comparison of non-invasive and invasive arterial blood pressure measurement for assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation.用于评估动态脑自动调节功能的无创与有创动脉血压测量的比较。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Feb;20(1):60-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9949-4.
10
Reduced-order modeling and analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation via diffusion maps.基于扩散映射的动态脑自动调节的降阶建模与分析。
Physiol Meas. 2023 Apr 12;44(4). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/acc780.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced neuromonitoring powered by ICM+ and its place in the Brand New AI World, reflections at the 20th anniversary boundary.由ICM+驱动的高级神经监测及其在全新人工智能世界中的地位,在20周年之际的思考。
Brain Spine. 2024 May 19;4:102835. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102835. eCollection 2024.
2
Test-retest reliability of transfer function analysis metrics for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation to spontaneous blood pressure oscillations.评估自发性血压波动的传递函数分析指标的重测信度。
Exp Physiol. 2024 Jul;109(7):1024-1039. doi: 10.1113/EP091500. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: A CARNet white paper 2022 update.
动态脑自动调节传递函数分析:2022 年 CARNet 白皮书更新。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023 Jan;43(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221119760. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
4
: Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: To band or not to band?动态脑自动调节传递函数分析:带通还是不带通?
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023 Sep;43(9):1628-1630. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221098448. Epub 2022 May 5.