• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与首次和重复献血相关的因素:不良反应及对献血者行为的影响。

Factors associated with first-time and repeat blood donation: Adverse reactions and effects on donor behavior.

作者信息

Brunson Dalton C, Belanger Geoffrey A, Sussmann Harry, Fine Andrew M, Pandey Suchitra, Pham Tho D

机构信息

Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Stanford Blood Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2022 Jun;62(6):1269-1279. doi: 10.1111/trf.16893. Epub 2022 May 5.

DOI:10.1111/trf.16893
PMID:35510783
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood centers have a dual mission to protect donors and patients; donor safety is paramount to maintaining an adequate blood supply. Elucidating donor factors associated with adverse reactions (AR) is critical to this mission.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of whole blood donors from 2003 to 2020 was conducted at a single blood center in northern California. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs for ARs were estimated via multivariable logistic regression on demographics, donation history, and physical examination data. Where appropriate, Wilcoxon-Rank Sum and chi-squared tests were used to determine significance.

RESULTS

First-time blood donors (FTD) exhibited a higher AR rate than repeat donors (4.4% vs. 1.9% p < .0001). When compared with FTDs without AR, FTDs with ARs (FT-AR) were less likely to return (30.0% vs. 47.3%, p < .0001), and, of those who returned, had a higher rate of reaction 20.2% versus 2.8% (p < .001). Factors found to be associated with FT-AR (younger age, increased heart rate, and higher diastolic blood pressure) still correlated positively with AR on return donation, but to a lower degree. FTD who potentially witnessed an AR had a lower return rate (44.6% vs. 47.3%, p = <.001) and donated fewer units (2.38 vs. 3.37, p < .001) when compared to FTD who did not witness an AR.

CONCLUSION

The AR on FTD increases the AR likelihood of return donation. Longitudinal analysis shows that a time-based deferral policy targeted at FT-AR young donors can reduce the number of ARs while not dramatically impacting the blood supply.

摘要

背景

血液中心肩负着保护献血者和患者的双重使命;献血者安全对于维持充足的血液供应至关重要。阐明与不良反应(AR)相关的献血者因素对这一使命至关重要。

研究设计/方法:对2003年至2020年期间加利福尼亚北部一家单一血液中心的全血献血者进行回顾性队列分析。通过对人口统计学、献血历史和体格检查数据进行多变量逻辑回归,估计AR的调整优势比(AOR)及95%置信区间。在适当情况下,使用Wilcoxon秩和检验和卡方检验来确定显著性。

结果

首次献血者(FTD)的AR发生率高于重复献血者(4.4%对1.9%,p <.0001)。与无AR的FTD相比,有AR的FTD(FT-AR)再次献血的可能性较小(30.0%对47.3%,p <.0001),并且在再次献血的人中,反应发生率更高(20.2%对2.8%,p <.001)。发现与FT-AR相关的因素(年龄较小、心率加快和舒张压较高)在再次献血时与AR仍呈正相关,但程度较低。与未目睹AR的FTD相比,可能目睹AR的FTD再次献血率较低(44.6%对47.3%,p =<.001)且献血单位数较少(2.38对3.37,p <.001)。

结论

FTD的AR增加了再次献血时发生AR的可能性。纵向分析表明,针对FT-AR年轻献血者的基于时间的延期政策可以减少AR的数量,同时不会对血液供应产生重大影响。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with first-time and repeat blood donation: Adverse reactions and effects on donor behavior.与首次和重复献血相关的因素:不良反应及对献血者行为的影响。
Transfusion. 2022 Jun;62(6):1269-1279. doi: 10.1111/trf.16893. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
The consequences of temporary deferral on future whole blood donation.暂时延期对未来全血捐献的影响。
Transfusion. 2007 Aug;47(8):1514-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01292.x.
3
Changes in the Whole Blood Donor Population in South-West Germany: 2010 versus 2016.德国西南部全血捐献者群体的变化:2010年与2016年对比
Transfus Med Hemother. 2017 Aug;44(4):217-223. doi: 10.1159/000479192. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
4
Adverse reactions and other factors that impact subsequent blood donation visits.不良反应及其他因素对后续献血访问的影响。
Transfusion. 2012 Jan;52(1):118-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03216.x. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
5
Risk factors for complications in donors at first and repeat whole blood donation: a cohort study with assessment of the impact on donor return.首次和重复全血捐献者并发症的风险因素:队列研究评估对供者回归的影响
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s28-36. doi: 10.2450/2013.0262-12. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
In the Mood for a Blood Donation? Pilot Study about Momentary Mood, Satisfaction, and Return Behavior in Deferred First-Time Donors.想献血吗?关于首次延期献血者的瞬时情绪、满意度和再次献血行为的试点研究。
Transfus Med Hemother. 2021 Aug;48(4):220-227. doi: 10.1159/000514016. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
7
Analysis of Chinese donors' return behavior.中国捐赠者回流行为分析。
Transfusion. 2011 Mar;51(3):523-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02876.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
8
Long-term return behavior of Chinese whole blood donors.中国全血献血者的长期回输行为。
Transfusion. 2013 Sep;53(9):1985-91. doi: 10.1111/trf.12142. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
9
Do deferred donors continue their donations? A large-scale register study on whole blood donor return in the Netherlands.推迟供者是否会继续献血?荷兰一项关于全血献血者回归的大规模登记研究。
Transfusion. 2019 Dec;59(12):3657-3665. doi: 10.1111/trf.15551. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Offering new and returned donors the option to give plasma: implications for donor retention and donor adverse events.为新老献血者提供捐献血浆的选择:对献血者保留率和献血者不良事件的影响。
Vox Sang. 2021 Mar;116(3):273-280. doi: 10.1111/vox.12977. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for vasovagal reactions in blood donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.献血者血管迷走神经反应的危险因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Transfusion. 2025 Jan;65(1):211-223. doi: 10.1111/trf.18078. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
Sociodemographic Factors Related to Adverse Donor Reactions in Shenzhen.深圳与供体不良反应相关的社会人口学因素
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Nov 23;16:5493-5499. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S443682. eCollection 2023.
3
Characterization of the Human Blood Virome in Iranian Multiple Transfused Patients.伊朗多次输血患者血液病毒组特征。
Viruses. 2023 Jun 23;15(7):1425. doi: 10.3390/v15071425.